porn japanese vk

• Cast & crew
• User reviews

A high-powered CEO puts her career and family on the line when she begins a torrid affair with her much-younger intern. A high-powered CEO puts her career and family on the line when she begins a torrid affair with her much-younger intern. A high-powered CEO puts her career and family on the line when she begins a torrid affair with her much-younger intern.

• Halina Reijn
• Nicole Kidman
• Harris Dickinson
• Antonio Banderas
• 1 User review
• 42 Critic reviews
• 82 Metascore
• 1 win & 1 nomination

Top cast 37

• All cast & crew
• Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

More like this

Did you know

• Trivia Jean Reno shot scenes for the film, but was cut entirely from the finished film.

User reviews 1

• Sep 1, 2024

The 2024 Festival Films You Need to Know

• December 25, 2024 (United States)
• Netherlands
• United States
• New York City, New York, USA (street scenes)
• Man Up Film
• See more company credits at IMDbPro

Technical specs

• Runtime 1 hour 54 minutes

Related news

Contribute to this page.

• See more gaps
• Learn more about contributing

More to explore

Recently viewed.

How to unblock Xnxx for free

TL;DR: Unblock your favorite porn sites with a VPN. The best service for unblocking porn sites like Xnxx is ExpressVPN .

Your access to your favorite porn sites is not guaranteed. There are many locations around the world that will restrict your access to porn sites, and that's probably for the best. That being said, there is a time and a place for everything. And when the time is right to visit a porn site, you'll want to be able to secure access without delay.

If you want to bypass online restrictions to unblock porn sites from anywhere in the world, you should consider using a VPN . These handy tools can hide your digital location to unlock the best of the web.

If you're looking for the best way to unblock sites like Xnxx from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

VPNs can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to secure servers in other locations. This simple process means you can bypass geo-restrictions to access porn sites like Xnxx from anywhere in the world.

Follow these simple steps to unblock porn sites:

Sign up for a VPN (like ExpressVPN )

Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

Open up the app and connect to a server in a location that supports access to Xnxx

Watch Xnxx videos from anywhere in the world

The best VPNs for bypassing content restrictions are not free, but leading VPNs do tend to offer free-trial periods or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can unblock porn sites like Xnxx without actually spending anything. This obviously isn't a long-term solution, but it does mean you can retain access to porn sites when traveling or temporarily away from home.

If you want to retain permanent access to the best free porn sites from around the world, you'll need a subscription. Fortunately, the best VPN for bypassing online restrictions is on sale for a limited time.

What is the best VPN for porn?

ExpressVPN is the best service for fast and reliable unblocking of porn sites like Xnxx, for a number of reasons:

Servers in 105 countries

Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

Strict no-logging policy

Fast streaming speeds free from throttling

Up to eight simultaneous connections

30-day money-back guarantee

A one-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $99.95 and includes an extra three months for free — 49% off for a limited time. This plan also includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee.

Unblock Xnxx for free with ExpressVPN.

Topics Porn Streaming How to Watch

Joseph Green is the Global Shopping Editor for Mashable. He covers VPNs, headphones, fitness gear, dating sites, streaming services, and shopping events like Black Friday and Prime Day.

Joseph is also Executive Editor of Mashable's sister site, AskMen.

Amazon Prime Day 2024

Latest prime day.

• How do you find lightning deals at Amazon? Here's how to shop those limited-time promotions.
• Creating an Amazon wishlist is our go-to Prime Day shopping hack
• October Prime Day is almost here — check out the best Apple deals you can snag ahead of the event
• Best Buy's fall deals schedule includes major October Prime Day competition
• Early Prime Day deals are rolling in — shop wireless earbuds now
• October Prime Day is coming and early deals are rolling in on headphones and speakers — but we're holding out for more
• With October Prime Day around the corner, shop these early deals on noise-cancelling headphones
• Amazon Echo Show 5 vs. Echo Show 8: Which one should you buy on Prime Day?
• Yes, another Prime Day is coming. Here are the early deals to shop now.
• Target Circle Week is back...just in time for Prime Day

The Best Prime Day Deals

• Self-emptying robot vacuums already on sale ahead of Prime Day
• All the best iPad deals ahead of October Prime Day
• Grab early October Prime Day unlocked phone deals from Samsung, Motorola, and Google
• Amazon just dropped prices on a bunch of Bluetooth speakers for Prime Big Deal Days
• AirPods deals are sparse a week ahead of October Prime day, but here's what is on sale
• Samsung Galaxy deals are already popping off ahead of October Prime Day
• The best early October Prime Day tablet deals highlight Fire models, Galaxy Tabs, and some sneaky iPads
• Need a printer? Amazon's early October Prime Day prices are worth a look.
• October Prime Day is just around the corner: Here are the Apple Watches you can already grab on sale
• 35+ kitchen deals to shop before October Prime Day: Ninja Foodi, Instant Pot, and more

Prime Day News & Tips

• October Prime Day is closer than you think: 4 tips for finding the best deals
• October Prime Day is just around the corner. Here's what to buy, and what not to.
• What not to buy during Amazon's October Prime Day sale
• When does Prime Big Deal Days start? October Prime Day officially has dates.

• Create account
• Contributions

VK (service)

• Azərbaycanca
• Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
• Bahasa Indonesia
• Lëtzebuergesch
• Bahasa Melayu
• Norsk bokmål
• Norsk nynorsk
• Oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча
• Qaraqalpaqsha
• Српски / srpski
• Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
• Татарча / tatarça
• Vepsän kel’

As of August 2018 [update] , VK had at least 500 million accounts. [ 5 ] As of November 2022, it was the sixth most popular website in Russia. [ 6 ] The network was also popular in Ukraine until it was banned by the Verkhovna Rada in 2017. [ 7 ]

According to Semrush , in 2024 VK is the 30th most visited website in the world . [ 8 ]

VKontakte was conceived in 2006 when Pavel Durov , creator of the popular student forum spbgu.ru , met his former classmate Vyacheslav Mirilashvili in St. Petersburg after graduating from the Faculty of Philology at St Petersburg State University . Vyacheslav showed Durov the increasingly popular Facebook , after which the friends decided to create a new Russian social network. Lev Leviev , an Israeli classmate of Vyacheslav Mirilashivili, became the third co-founder. Vyacheslav Mirilashvili borrowed the money from his billionaire father and became the largest shareholder. Lev Leviev took over operational management, and Durov became CEO. Pavel Durov attracted his older brother Nikolai , a multiple winner of international math and programming competitions, to develop the site. [ 9 ] [ 10 ]

Durov launched VKontakte for beta testing in September 2006. The following month, the domain name Vkontakte.ru was registered. [ 11 ] The new project was incorporated on 19 January 2007 as a Russian private limited company. In February 2007 the site reached a user base of over 100,000 and was recognized as the second largest company in Russia's nascent social network market. In the same month, the site was subjected to a severe DDoS attack, which briefly put it offline. The user base reached 1 million in July 2007, and 10 million in April 2008. In December 2008 VK overtook rival Odnoklassniki as Russia's most popular social networking service. [ 12 ]

Similar to many social networks, the platform's fundamental features revolve around private messaging, sharing photos, posting status updates, and exchanging links with friends. VK also provides tools for administering online communities and managing celebrity pages. The site allows its users to upload, search and stream media content, such as videos and music. VK features an advanced search engine, that allows complex queries for finding friends, as well as a real-time news search. VK updated its features and design in April 2016. [ 13 ]

• Messaging . VK Private Messages can be exchanged between groups of 2 to 500 people. An email address can also be specified as the recipient. Each message may contain up to 10 attachments: Photos, Videos, Audio Files, Maps (an embedded map with a manually placed marker), and Documents. [ 14 ]
• News . VK users can post on their profile walls, each post may contain up to 10 attachments – media files, maps, and documents (see above). User mentions and hashtags are supported. In the case of multiple photo attachments, the previews are automatically scaled and arranged in a magazine-style layout. The news feed can be switched between all news (default) and most interesting modes. The site features a news-recommendation engine, global real-time search, and individual search for posts and comments on specific users' walls.
• Communities . VK features three types of communities. Groups are better suited for decentralized communities (discussion boards, wiki-style articles, editable by all members, etc.). Public pages is a news feed-orientated broadcasting tool for celebrities and businesses. The two types are largely interchangeable, the main difference being in the default settings. The third type of community is called Events , which are used for appropriately organizing concerts and events in an appropriate way. [ 15 ]

• Like buttons . VK like buttons for posts, comments, media, and external sites operate differently from Facebook. Liked content doesn't get automatically pushed to the user's wall, but is saved in the private Favorites section instead. The user has to press a second 'share with friends' button to share an item on their wall or send it via private message to a friend.
• Privacy . Users can control the availability of their content within the network and on the Internet. Blanket and granular privacy settings are available for pages and individual content.
• Synchronization with other social networks . Any news published on the VK wall will appear on Facebook or Twitter . Certain news may not be published by clicking on the logo next to the "Send" button. Editing a post in VK does not change the post in Facebook or Twitter and vice versa. However, removing the news in VK will remove it from other social networks.
• SMS service . Russian users can receive and reply to a private message or leave a comment for community news using SMS.
• Music. Users have access to the audio files uploaded by other users. In addition, users can upload the audio files themselves, create playlists and share audios with others by attaching to messages and wall posts. The uploaded audio files cannot violate copyright laws. [ 16 ]

As of May 2017, according to Alexa Internet ranking, VK is one of the most visited websites in some Eurasian countries. It is:

• 4th most visited in Russia ; [ 17 ]
• 3rd most visited in Belarus ; [ 18 ]
• 6th most visited in Kazakhstan ; [ 19 ]
• 8th most visited in Kyrgyzstan [ 20 ] and Moldova ; [ 21 ]
• 12th most visited in Latvia . [ 22 ]

It was the fourth most viewed site in Ukraine until, in May 2017, the Ukrainian government banned the use of VK in Ukraine. [ 23 ] According to a study for May 2018 conducted by Factum Group Ukraine VK remained the fourth most viewed site in Ukraine, but Facebook was twice as much visited. [ 24 ] For 2019, VK appeared as the most visited social network in Ukraine according to Alexa. [ 25 ] According to the Internet Association of Ukraine the share of Ukrainian Internet users who visit VK daily had fallen from 54% to 10% from September 2016 to September 2019. [ 26 ] They also claimed in November 2019 that Facebook was the most popular social network. [ 26 ]

VK was expected to gain most of the users lost by Facebook and Instagram after they were blocked in Russia in 2022, according to a Calltouch poll. [ 27 ]

Initially, founder and CEO Pavel Durov owned 20% of shares (although he had majority voting power through proxy votes), and a trio of Russian-Israeli investors Yitzchak Mirilashvili , his father Mikhael Mirilashvili , and Lev Leviev [ 28 ] owned 60%, 10%, and 10% respectively. [ 29 ]

In 2007, Digital Sky Technologies, an investment company managed by Yuri Milner , acquired a total of 24.99% of the shares from shareholders, investing $16.3 million. [ 10 ] In preparation for the IPO in September 2010, DST separated international and Russian assets: the former formed the DST Global fund, while the latter, including VKontakte and rival social network Odnoklassniki , were merged into Mail.ru Group . Mail.ru Group used part of the money to acquire 7.5% of the social network for $112.5 million at a valuation of the entire project of 1.5 billion dollars. After exercising a 7.5% option in July 2011 for $111.7 million, Mail.ru Group accumulated a 39.99% stake in VKontakte. [ 30 ] [ 31 ] [ 32 ]

The head of Mail.ru Group, Dmitry Grishin , voiced the company's intention to gain 100% control over VKontakte. MRG was discussing with shareholders to buy out shares from the valuation of the entire company in $2-3 billion. In the summer of 2011, Mirilashvili and Leviev were ready to accept in payment owned by Mail.ru Group shares of Facebook, Groupon , and Zynga , but the deal failed due to Durov's unwillingness to sell a stake on MRG terms. Later, the co-founders considered VKontakte's IPO as an alternative. In March 2012, Durov "accidentally" became plugged into the negotiations where Mirilashvili and Leviev discussed selling their stakes directly to Mail.ru Group's main investor, Alisher Usmanov . On the same day, Durov deleted the pages of the first co-investors, stopped contacting them, and soon announced that VKontakte would postpone its IPO indefinitely. [ 30 ] [ 33 ]

On 29 May 2012, Mail.ru Group announced its decision to yield control of the company to Durov by offering him the voting rights on its shares. Combined with Durov's personal 12% stake, this gave him 52% of the votes. [ 34 ] [ 35 ]

In April 2013, the Mirilashvili family sold its 40% share in VK to United Capital Partners for $1.12 billion, [ 36 ] [ 37 ] while Lev Leviev sold his 8% share in the same deal, giving United Capital Partners 48% ownership. In January 2014, VK's founder Pavel Durov sold his 12% stake in the company to Ivan Tavrin , the CEO of MegaFon , which is controlled by Alisher Usmanov . Following the deal, Usmanov and his allies controlled around 52% of the company. [ 38 ] Shortly thereafter, the CEO of Megafon, sold his 12% stake to Mail.ru, thus allowing Mail.ru to consolidate its controlling stake of 52% in VK. [ 39 ]

On 1 April 2014, Durov submitted his resignation to the board; at first, due to the fact the company confirmed he had resigned, it was believed to be related to the Russo-Ukrainian War which began in the previous February. [ 40 ] However, Durov himself claimed it was an April Fool's Joke on 3 April 2014. [ 41 ] On 21 April 2014, Durov was dismissed as CEO, claiming he failed to withdraw his letter of resignation a month earlier. [ 42 ] [ 43 ] Durov then claimed the company had been effectively taken over by Vladimir Putin 's political faction, [ 42 ] [ 44 ] suggesting his dismissal was the result of both his refusal to hand over personal details of users to federal law enforcement and his refusal to hand over the personal details of people who were members of a VKontakte group dedicated to the Euromaidan protest movement. [ 42 ] [ 44 ] Durov then left Russia and stated that he had "no plans to go back" [ 44 ] and that "the country is incompatible with Internet business at the moment". [ 43 ]

On 16 September 2014, the Mail.ru group bought the remaining 48% stake of VK from United Capital Partners (UCP) [ 45 ] for $1.5 billion, [ 45 ] thus becoming the sole proprietor of the social network. [ 46 ]

In December 2021, Russian state-owned bank Gazprombank and insurance company Sogaz bought out 57.3% of VK shares, thus becoming the holders of the company's controlling interest . [ 47 ] [ 48 ]

Controversies

Copyright issues

In 2008, the leading Russian television channel TV Russia (TV channel name RTR used in 1991–2002, then Russia 1) and television company VGTRK sued VKontakte (then VK) over unlicensed copies of two of its films which had been uploaded by VK users. In 2010, this dispute was settled by the Russian High Arbitration Court in favour of the social network. The court ruled that VK is not responsible for its users’ copyright violations, taking into account that both parties agreed with the technical possibility to identify the user who posted illegal content and who, consequently, must incur the liability. [ 49 ] Another ruling early in 2012 went partially in favor of Gala Records (now Warner Music Russia) , a recording studio, when the same court ordered VK to pay $7000 for not being active enough in regard to copyrighted materials. [ 50 ]

Efforts against copyright infringement

VK offers a content removal tool for copyright holders. [ 51 ] [ 52 ] Large-scale copyright holders may gain access to bulk content removal tools. [ 53 ]

Since 2010, VK has also entered several partnerships with legal content providers such as television networks. [ 54 ] and streaming providers. [ 55 ] Most notably, the Video on Demand provider Ivi.ru that has secured licensing rights with all Hollywood majors in 2012. [ 56 ] These partnerships allow providers to remove user-uploaded content from VK and substitute it with legal embedded copies from the provider's site. [ 57 ] This legal content can be either ad-sponsored, subscription-based, or free, depending on the provider's choices. VK does not display its own advertising in the site's music or video sections, nor in the videos themselves. In October 2013, VKontakte was cleared of copyright infringement charges by a court in Saint Petersburg . The judge ruled that the social network is not responsible for the content uploaded by its users. [ 58 ]

In November 2014, the head of the Roskomnadzor , Maxim Ksenzov , said that VKontakte would complete the process of legalization of the content at the beginning of 2015. At that time (November 2014), negotiations between major label companies and the social network VKontakte were ongoing. [ 59 ]

DDoS attacks on sites

Because the social network is one of the most popular and visited sites in runet , its visits can be used to make DDoS attacks on smaller sites. VK performed DDOS attacks on certain sites, making users' browsers send multiple requests to the target site without their consent. The targets were the Runet Prize voting page in 2008 [ 60 ] and the CAPTCHA -solving service antigate.com in 2012. [ 61 ] [ 62 ] It was done by inserting an iframe and a piece of JavaScript code which periodically reloaded the iframe. As a countermeasure, antigate was detecting whether iframe was loaded from VK and if it were antigate had redirected request to xHamster , a pornography website . VK needed to cease the attack due to the site's use by children. VK tried to use XMLHttpRequest to solve this problem, but had forgotten about the same-origin policy . They succeeded in stopping the attack, though there were many ways to solve the problem with redirect [ original research? ] .

Durov's dismissal

Durov was dismissed as CEO in April 2014 after he had failed to retract a letter of resignation. Durov contended that the resignation letter was an April fools prank. [ 42 ] Durov then claimed Vladimir Putin's allies had, in effect, taken over the company, [ 42 ] [ 44 ] [ 63 ] and suggested his ousting was the result of his refusal to hand over personal details of users to the Russian Federal Security Service and his refusal to shut down a VK group dedicated to anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny . [ 42 ] [ 44 ]

On 24 May 2013, it was reported in the media that the site had been mistakenly put on a list of websites banned by the Russian government. [ 64 ] Some critics have accused the blacklist as the latest in a series of suspicious incidents to have happened to the website in recent months as a way for the Russian government to increase their stake in, and control of the site. [ 65 ]

On 18 November 2013, following an order from the Court of Rome , VK was blocked in Italy after a complaint from Medusa Film stating that it was hosting an illegal copy of one of its films. [ 66 ] However, in April 2015, the site was reopened for Italian users and its mobile app is available on both the App Store and Google Play . [ citation needed ]

In January 2016, China banned VKontakte, claiming that it was manipulating web content and cooperating with the Kremlin. According to Russia's media watchdog , the network estimates around 300,000 users based in China. [ 67 ] As of 14 February 2018, China authorities unblocked VKontakte and it was fully accessible in the country. [ 68 ]

In May 2017, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko signed a decree to impose a ban on Mail.ru and its widely used social networks including VKontakte and Odnoklassniki as part of its continued sanctions on Russia for its annexation of Crimea and involvement in the war in Donbas . [ 23 ] [ 69 ] [ 70 ] Reporters Without Borders condemned the ban, calling it a "disproportionate measure that seriously undermines the Ukrainian people's right to information and freedom of expression." [ 71 ] VK closed its office in Ukraine's capital Kyiv in June 2017. [ 72 ]

In December 2021, VKontakte's CEO, Boris Dobrodeev resigned from his post. Reuters linked Dobrodeev's resignation to the acquisition of VK's majority interest by two state-owned companies that happened the same month. According to one analyst, the state consolidation of VKontakte would cause greater censorship by the government. [ 73 ]

On 12 May 2022, in connection with the sanctions imposed by the European Union (EU), NEPLP decided to limit the activity of "VKontakte" ("vk.com"), "Odnoklassniki" ("ok.ru") and "Moy Mir" ("my.mail.ru") social medias in Latvia. The decision was made because NEPLP has evidence that the platforms are owned and controlled by Yury Kovalchuk and Vladimir Kiriyenko . The mentioned persons are subject to EU sanctions in connection with undermining the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. [ 74 ]

After Russian military invasion of Ukraine , on 26 September 2022, the VK application (as well as other applications of the holding services) was removed from the Apple App Store due to international sanctions . [ 75 ] [ 76 ] On 28 September, the Russian communications regulator Roskomnadzor issued a statement demanding an explanation for the removal of the VK application from the App Store. [ 77 ] CEO Vladimir Kiriyenko was sanctioned by the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, European Union, Japan, Australia and various countries. [ 78 ]

Prosecution of users in Russia

In July 2012, VKontakte was accused of close cooperation with the Centre for Combating Extremism (Centre E) , a unit within the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs heavily criticized for repressing opposition activists. [ 79 ] [ 80 ] For publications, reposts, comments and likes posted on their VKontakte pages, dozens of Russian citizens were sentenced to fines, suspended sentences and imprisonment. Most of the cases against users are qualified as propaganda of extremism, xenophobia and Nazism. Statistically, among all the social networking services available in Russia, the users of VKontakte were targeted by police almost exclusively. [ 81 ]

Events and projects

Automated workplace of a civil servant.

By 2023, on the basis of VK, the “Automated workplace of a civil servant” (АРМ ГС in Russian) was developed, to which it is planned to transfer all Russian civil servants. AWP includes mail, calendar, cloud storage, instant messenger, supports audio and video calls. It should replace Telegram, WhatsApp, Gmail, Google Docs, Zoom and Skype widely used in Russia. Thus, the Russian government intends to exclude foreign services from the public administration system. Officials were supposed to switch to "Automated workplace" from May 1, 2023. [ 82 ]

In June 2023, the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media announced a competition for software developers to "scale" the workspace and provide the necessary level of cryptographic protection. It is planned to spend 9 million rubles on the project. [ 83 ]

VK organized their first 24-hour Hackathon in 2015 from 31 October to 1 November. The participants were invited to develop projects united by a common idea: “Make it Simple!” (Russian: «Упрощайте!»). 34 teams took part in the competition. A prize pool of 300 thousand rubles was split among the winners. [ 84 ]

The second VK Hackathon took place from 26 to 27 November 2016. The participants developed projects for the community app platform. The “Search for Lost Cats” (Russian: «Поиск пропавших котиков») app won the “Developers’ Choice” category. The prize pool for the event was 300 thousand rubles. [ 85 ]

The third VK Hackathon took place from 20 to 22 October 2017 with 320 participants competing in the event. The prize pool was one million rubles. An application designed to help users navigate the State Hermitage Museum won the “Culture” category. [ 86 ]

Start Fellows

In 2011, Pavel Durov and Yuri Milner created Start Fellows, a grant program founded to support projects in the field of technology. [ 87 ] In 2014, VK took over the Start Fellows program and made it more systematic. The grant was provided to 3 companies each month and included project consultation from VK along with 25 thousand rubles a month for advertisement on the VK platform. Winners of the grant include “University Schedules” (Russian: «Расписание вузов»), a scheduling app, LiveCamDroid, a mobile streaming service, HTML Academy, an educational project, and others. [ 88 ] [ 89 ] [ 90 ] [ 91 ]

VK re-launched the project in 2017. Only active projects with an earnings model could submit applications. 327 grant applications were received but only 67 of them passed the initial screening. The total prize pool was 2.5 million rubles. [ 92 ]

The first VK Cup, a programming championship for young programmers aged 13–23, was held on 16 July 2012 in Saint Petersburg, Russia. [ 93 ]

VK and Codeforces co-organized the second VK Cup programming championship, which took place from 24 to 27 July 2015. The winners received a total of 1,048,576 or 2 20 rubles (an amount related to round binary numbers). [ 94 ]

The third VK Cup took place from 1 to 4 July 2016 and had a prize pool of 2.5 million rubles. [ 95 ]

VK and Codeforces co-organized the fourth VK Cup which took place from 8 to 9 July 2017. Teams from 52 countries applied to take part in the competition. The prize pool for the competition was 2.5 million rubles. [ 96 ]

VK Music Awards

The first VK Music Awards ceremony took place on 25 December 2017. The VK Music Awards were produced by Timur Bekmambetov and the Bazelevs Company with Pavel Volya hosting the event. [ 97 ] The awards ceremony was held in the form of an online live stream. [ 98 ] Any VK user could watch the broadcast live. After the ceremony, a private concert was held in the Vegas City Hall in Moscow. Tickets to the event could be won through a contest held in the VK Music community. [ 97 ] VK Music Awards winners were determined by the number of plays an artist's song got on VK and the BOOM app. The names of the 30 award winners were published on the official VK Music Awards community page and on the BOOM app website. “Rosé Wine” ( Allj and Feduk ), “Lambada” ( T-Fest  [ ru ] and Scriptonite ), and “My Half” ( MiyaGi and Endspiel  [ ru ] ) topped the list of most listened to songs. The official pages of all award winners have been marked with a special symbol. [ 99 ]

Since 2015, VK has held a yearly 2-day open-air music and entertainment festival. This festival traditionally takes place on a weekend in July at the 300th Anniversary Park  [ ru ] (Russian: Парк имени 300-летия Санкт-Петербурга) in St. Petersburg, Russia. According to data from the organizer, 70 thousand people attended the festival in 2016, with the number rising to 85 thousand attendees in 2017. In 2017, around 40 artists and groups performed on 3 stages, including Little Big , The Hatters , and others. Bloggers and other famous individuals, such as Dmitry Grishin , Timur Bekmambetov , and Mikhail Piotrovsky (speakers at the 2017 festival), are also an important part of the festival. More than 1.5 million people watched the festival's official live stream. [ 100 ]

• Ambient awareness
• Internet in Russia
• List of social networking websites
• ^ "Каталог пользователей ВКонтакте" . VK.com. Archived from the original on 21 May 2021 . Retrieved 28 December 2012 .
• ^ "Во «ВКонтакте» появилась возможность редактировать отправленные сообщения" . 27 November 2017. Archived from the original on 9 July 2023 . Retrieved 13 September 2023 .
• ^ "• Social gaming: revenue in Russia 2010-2013 | Statistic" . Statista.com. Archived from the original on 21 August 2019 . Retrieved 23 February 2015 .
• ^ "List of VK users" . Vk.com. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020 . Retrieved 5 February 2018 .
• ^ "Russia's Top Websites Ranking in November 2022 | Similarweb" . Similarweb . Archived from the original on 16 March 2022 . Retrieved 20 December 2022 .
• ^ "Рада підтримала продовження заборони на російські соцмережі" . Archived from the original on 25 July 2021 . Retrieved 25 July 2021 .
• ^ "Website Ranking" . Semrush . Retrieved 29 April 2024 .
• ^ Loshak, Andrei (16 October 2019). "История рунета. Бизнес: ОК, ВК и все-все-все" . Радио Свобода (in Russian). Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty . Retrieved 17 April 2024 .
• ^ a b "Код Павла Дурова" . Forbes (in Russian). 24 June 2011 . Retrieved 17 April 2024 .
• ^ Friedrichsen & Mühl-Benninghaus 2013 , p. 406.
• ^ "Vkontakte Remains more popular than Facebook in Russia" . Mynewsdesk . Archived from the original on 7 August 2018 . Retrieved 7 August 2018 .
• ^ "VK.com New Interface, Design, Looks & Tips" . Archived from the original on 18 September 2016 . Retrieved 22 August 2016 .
• ^ Supported are the formats: doc, docx, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, rtf, pdf, png, jpg, gif, psd, mp3, djvu, fb2, ps and archives containing these formats. Executable files and files over 200 Mb are not allowed. Video chat is also available (for users who allow incoming calls) since 2012.
• ^ "Types of community pages" . vk.com . Archived from the original on 17 March 2020 . Retrieved 20 February 2018 .
• ^ "Vkontakte Music 2.0" . vk.com . Archived from the original on 8 May 2017 . Retrieved 20 February 2018 .
• ^ "Alexa - top sites in Russia" . Alexa.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009 . Retrieved 31 May 2017 .
• ^ "Alexa - top sites in Belarus" . Alexa.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009 . Retrieved 31 May 2017 .
• ^ "Alexa - top sites in Kazakhstan" . Alexa.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009 . Retrieved 31 May 2017 .
• ^ "Alexa - top sites in Kyrgyzstan" . Alexa.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009 . Retrieved 31 May 2017 .
• ^ "Alexa - top sites in Moldova" . Alexa.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009 . Retrieved 31 May 2017 .
• ^ "Alexa - top sites in Latvia" . Alexa.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009 . Retrieved 31 May 2017 .
• ^ a b Ukraine's Poroshenko to block Russian social networks Archived 9 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine , BBC News (16 May 2017)
• ^ Banned VK social network remains fourth in Internet traffic in Ukraine in May Archived 30 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine , Interfax-Ukraine (13 June 2018)
• ^ "Alexa - top sites in Ukraine" . Alexa.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2009 . Retrieved 9 August 2019 .
• ^ a b (in Ukrainian) Three years without VKontakte: what social networks do Ukrainians prefer Archived 14 November 2019 at the Wayback Machine , Ukrayinska Pravda (14 November 2019)
• ^ "Rossiyskaya Gazeta: Most Russians ready to move to domestic social media platforms" . Rossiyskaya Gazeta . 24 March 2022. Archived from the original on 20 April 2022 . Retrieved 24 March 2022 .
• ^ "Lev Leviev sells Russian social network stake" . Globes. 18 April 2013. Archived from the original on 6 July 2013 . Retrieved 24 August 2013 .
• ^ Кто в контакте (in Russian). Vedomosti. 29 February 2008 . Retrieved 16 April 2011 .
• ^ a b "Театр Дурова: почему основатель «ВКонтакте» проиграл битву за социальную сеть" . Forbes (in Russian). 20 March 2014 . Retrieved 17 April 2024 .
• ^ "Exercise of Option" . Mail.ru Group. 14 July 2011. Archived from the original on 6 October 2011 . Retrieved 29 July 2011 .
• ^ "Vkontakte.ru shareholder structure unveiled" . East-West Digital News. 6 August 2011. Archived from the original on 27 September 2011 . Retrieved 14 November 2012 .
• ^ "Лев Левиев впервые рассказал свою версию продажи «ВКонтакте»" . The Bell . 1 November 2019 . Retrieved 17 April 2024 .
• ^ "Shareholder Mail.ru Group yields control to founder" . ewdn.com. 30 May 2012. Archived from the original on 2 June 2012 . Retrieved 30 May 2012 .
• ^ Bowker, John (29 May 2012). "Russia's VKontakte delays IPO after Facebook debacle" . Moscow: Reuters. Archived from the original on 23 January 2016 . Retrieved 31 May 2012 .
• ^ "The richest Israelis got NIS 10 billion richer in 2013" . Haaretz . Haaretz.com. Archived from the original on 27 July 2013 . Retrieved 23 February 2015 .
• ^ "UCP closes deal to buy 48% of Vkontakte from Mirilashvili, Leviev" , interfax , archived from the original on 23 June 2019 , retrieved 14 February 2014
• ^ Maria Kiselyova (24 January 2014). "Usmanov tightens hold on Russian social net VKontakte as founder sells stake" . The West Australian (Reuters). Archived from the original on 1 March 2014 . Retrieved 18 February 2014 .
• ^ Olga Razumovskaya (18 March 2014). "Mail.Ru Secures Control of VKontakte" . The Wall Street Journal . Archived from the original on 18 March 2014 . Retrieved 18 March 2014 .
• ^ "No joke as 'Russian Facebook' founder resigns amid dispute (Update)" Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine . Published 1 April 2014. Retrieved 29 February 2016. Pavel Durov Resigns As Head Of Russian Social Network VK.com, Ukraine Conflict Was The Tipping Point Archived 8 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine . Published 1 April 2014. Retrieved 29 February 2016.
• ^ Going, going, gone - Pavel Durov quits VK Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine . Rusbase. Published 2 April 2014. No update time given. Retrieved 29 February 2016. Founder of Social Network VK Pavel Durov Says Resignation as CEO was April Fools' Prank Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine . The Moscow Times . Published at midnight Moscow Time (MST) on 4 April 2014. Last modified at 7:26 MST. Retrieved 29 February 2016.
• ^ a b c d e f "Vkontakte Founder Pavel Durov Learns He's Been Fired Through Media | Business" . The Moscow Times. 22 April 2014. Archived from the original on 23 April 2014 . Retrieved 23 February 2015 .
• ^ a b "Durov, Out For Good From VK.com, Plans A Mobile Social Network Outside Russia" Archived 6 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine , TechCrunch , 22 April 2014.
• ^ a b c d e "Pavel Durov left Russia after being pushed out" . Archived from the original on 24 April 2014 . Retrieved 23 April 2014 .
• ^ a b "Mail.ru deal firms control over VKontakte" . Financial Times . 16 September 2014. Archived from the original on 21 September 2014 . Retrieved 1 February 2017 .
• ^ "Russia's Mail.Ru buys remaining stake in VKontakte for $1.5 bln" . Reuters . 16 September 2014. Archived from the original on 21 June 2020 . Retrieved 20 January 2015 .
• ^ "Russia takes direct control of top social media networks" . The Bell. 6 December 2021. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ "Gazprom Gains Control of Russia's Top Social Network" . The Moscow Times. 3 December 2021. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ "Russian court rules social network not responsible for user copyright violations" . ewdn.com . 16 March 2011. Archived from the original on 22 October 2012 . Retrieved 17 September 2012 .
• ^ "Vkontakte.ru too "passive" with copyright infringement, says arbitration court" . ewdn.com . 22 February 2012. Archived from the original on 21 November 2020 . Retrieved 18 September 2012 .
• ^ "Copyright Violation Notification" . Vk.com. Archived from the original on 12 October 2011 . Retrieved 6 January 2013 .
• ^ "VK.com TakeDown Process | Artistic License" . Artistic License . Archived from the original on 26 October 2017 . Retrieved 5 July 2018 .
• ^ "TNT removes its videos from Vkontakte" . Lenta.ru (in Russian). 10 November 2010. Archived from the original on 22 November 2020 . Retrieved 18 September 2012 .
• ^ "CTC Media clamps down on piracy" . ewdn.com . 20 June 2011. Archived from the original on 16 June 2012 . Retrieved 17 September 2012 .
• ^ "Vkontakte to replace pirated video with legal content" . Lenta.ru . 25 November 2010. Archived from the original on 22 November 2020 . Retrieved 18 September 2012 .
• ^ "Russian Online Video Service ivi.ru Inks Deals with Hollywood Majors" . The Hollywood Reporter . 27 April 2012. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021 . Retrieved 20 February 2020 .
• ^ "Interview with Oleg Tumanov, Ivi.ru CEO" . RBC Daily (in Russian). 14 May 2012. Archived from the original on 1 November 2012 . Retrieved 18 September 2012 .
• ^ Andy (26 October 2013). "Russian Facebook Not Responsible For Users' Pirate Music Uploads" . Torrentfreak.com. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013 . Retrieved 21 June 2014 .
• ^ " "ВКонтакте" удалит весь пиратский контент в начале 2015 года | MacDigger - Новости из мира Apple" . Macdigger.ru. 20 November 2014. Archived from the original on 5 December 2014 . Retrieved 23 February 2015 .
• ^ "ВКонтакте против "Премии рунета" " . Habrahabr.ru. 24 October 2008. Archived from the original on 21 April 2012 . Retrieved 20 January 2015 .
• ^ " "ÂÊîíòàêòå" îñóùåñòâèë DDoS àòàêó íà ñàéò antigate.com" . Securitylab.ru. 26 April 2012. Archived from the original on 27 April 2012 . Retrieved 20 January 2015 .
• ^ "ВКонтакте ддосит antigate.com" . Habrahabr.ru. Archived from the original on 27 April 2012 . Retrieved 20 January 2015 .
• ^ Toor, Amar (22 April 2014). "Russia's largest social network is under the control of Putin's allies, founder says" . The Verge . Archived from the original on 23 April 2014 . Retrieved 23 February 2015 .
• ^ "Error blacklists Russia's top social network VKontakte" . BBC News . 24 May 2013. Archived from the original on 9 June 2013 . Retrieved 24 August 2013 .
• ^ Balmforth, Tom (28 May 2013). "Russia's Top Social Network Under Fire" . Rferl.org. Archived from the original on 28 May 2013 . Retrieved 24 August 2013 .
• ^ "How Berlusconi's Company Blocked Off vKontakte and File-Hosting Sites in Italy" . News.softpedia.com. 19 November 2013. Archived from the original on 20 November 2013 . Retrieved 21 June 2014 .
• ^ "Russia's Media Watchdog Boasts It 'Convinced' China to Lift Vkontakte Ban" . Archived from the original on 29 December 2018 . Retrieved 9 March 2018 .
• ^ "China unblocks Russian social network VKontakte" . TASS (in Russian). Archived from the original on 10 March 2018 . Retrieved 9 March 2018 .
• ^ Poroshenko, Petro (15 May 2017). "УКАЗ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА УКРАЇНИ №133/2017: Про рішення Ради національної безпеки і оборони України від 28 квітня 2017 року "Про застосування персональних спеціальних економічних та інших обмежувальних заходів (санкцій)" " [DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE №133 / 2017: On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine dated April 28, 2017 "On the application of personal special economic and other restrictive measures (sanctions)"] (in Ukrainian). President of Ukraine. Archived from the original on 16 May 2017 . Retrieved 13 March 2018 .
• ^ "Додаток 2 до рішення Ради національної безпеки і оборони України від "28" квітня 2017 року "Про застосування персональних спеціальних економічних та інших обмежувальних заходів (санкцій)" ЮРИДИЧНІ ОСОБИ, до яких застосовуються обмежувальні заходи (санкції)" [Annex 2 to the Decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine dated April 28, 2017 "On the Application of Personal special economic and other restrictive measures (sanctions) "Legal Entities under Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)"] (PDF) (in Ukrainian). President of Ukraine. 28 April 2017. p. 185-6 (#422 mail.ru Group), 186-7 (#423 ТОВ «Вконтакте» (VKontakte)), 187-8 (#424 ТОВ «В Контакті» (In Kontakte)) & 189 (#425 mail.ru Ukraine). This is a prohibition of Internet Service Providers (ISP) to provide access to the internet service «Mail.ru» (www.mail.ru) and social-oriented resources «Vkontakte» (www.vk.com) and «Odnoklassniki» (www. ok). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 May 2017 . Retrieved 13 March 2018 .
• ^ [1] Archived 31 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine | RSF | 23 May 2017
• ^ Russia's VKontakte closes office in Kyiv Archived 5 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine , UNIAN (17 June 2017)
• ^ Alexander Marrow (3 December 2021). "CEO of Russia's VK resigns as state assumes control of internet firm" . Reuters. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ "Latvijā bloķēs sociālos tīklus "Vkontakte" un "Odnoklassniki" " . Lsm.lv . Archived from the original on 12 May 2022 . Retrieved 12 May 2022 .
• ^ "Apple Removes Russian VK Apps From App Store in Response to UK Sanctions" . MacRumors . 28 September 2022. Archived from the original on 5 December 2022 . Retrieved 27 December 2022 .
• ^ "Приложение VK пропало из App Store" . rbc.ru (in Russian). 26 September 2022. Archived from the original on 27 September 2022 . Retrieved 26 September 2022 .
• ^ "Russia demands Apple explain after VK apps removed from App Store" . Reuters . 28 September 2022. Archived from the original on 28 September 2022 . Retrieved 28 September 2022 .
• ^ Faife, Corin (26 February 2022). "The US has sanctioned the head of Russia's largest social network" . The Verge . Archived from the original on 4 January 2023 . Retrieved 27 December 2022 .
• ^ "How the Kremlin Infiltrated Russia's Facebook" . Wired UK . ISSN   1357-0978 . Archived from the original on 29 July 2022 . Retrieved 29 July 2022 .
• ^ "The dark doings of Russia's Centre E" . openDemocracy . Archived from the original on 22 January 2023 . Retrieved 29 July 2022 .
• ^ "2016-07-07 In 'kontakt' with the cops When Russian police go after Internet users, why do they target people on VKontakte almost exclusively?" . Meduza . Archived from the original on 29 July 2022 . Retrieved 29 July 2022 .
• ^ "Госслужащим поручили перейти на мессенджер от VK до конца апреля" . Sostav.ru (in Russian). 7 March 2023. Archived from the original on 29 June 2023 . Retrieved 28 June 2023 .
• ^ "У российских чиновников появится свой мессенджер почти за 1 млрд рублей" . Banki.ru . 28 June 2023.
• ^ Kontsarenko, Philipp (2 November 2015). "Фоторепортаж: Первый хакатон "ВКонтакте" — Соцсети на vc.ru" . vc.ru . Archived from the original on 12 November 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ " "Поиск пропавших котиков": приложение, которое ищет потерявшихся животных с помощью нейросетей — Meduza" . Meduza (in Russian). Archived from the original on 4 December 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ "На Хакатоне "ВКонтакте" победили авторы приложения, помогающего выбрать маршрут в Эрмитаже" . «Бумага» (in Russian). 23 October 2017. Archived from the original on 4 December 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ Madhumita Venkataramanan (15 August 2012). "Europe's 100 hottest startups 2012: Moscow" . Wired. Archived from the original on 14 April 2017 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ Константин Панфилов (21 August 2014). "Победителем конкурса стартапов Start Fellows стал мобильный сервис видеостриминга LiveCamDroid" (in Russian). VC.ru. Archived from the original on 9 August 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ Константин Панфилов (16 October 2014). "Победителями конкурса стартапов Start Fellows от "ВКонтакте" стали HTML Academy и "Попутчик" " (in Russian). VC.ru. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ " "ВКонтакте" назвала нового получателя гранта Start Fellows" (in Russian). The Village. 15 July 2014. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ "Пробуждение с гарантией" (in Russian). Kommersant. 11 June 2019. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ "Победители Start Fellows получили 2,5 млн рублей от ВКонтакте" . Archived from the original on 18 June 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ " "ВКонтакте" назвали победителей VK Cup" (in Russian). Tass. 2 November 2020. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022 . Retrieved 14 April 2022 .
• ^ vc.ru, Редакция (27 July 2015). "Фоторепортаж: "ВКонтакте" провела второй чемпионат по программированию VK Cup 2015 — Соцсети на vc.ru" . vc.ru . Archived from the original on 13 November 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ "VK Cup 2016 - Codeforces" . Codeforces . Archived from the original on 6 March 2016 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ " "ВКонтакте" выплатила 2,5 миллиона рублей призёрам VK Cup 2017" . Собака.ru . Archived from the original on 21 November 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ a b " "ВКонтакте" завершит год вручением своей первой музыкальной премии" . 15 December 2017. Archived from the original on 28 October 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ "VK Music: Listen to songs and music online for free | VK" . Archived from the original on 11 March 2022 . Retrieved 9 September 2019 .
• ^ "В Москве прошла премия VK Music Awards. Были названы 30 главных треков года" . The-Flow.ru (in Russian). Archived from the original on 4 December 2018 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• ^ "В Петербурге на выходных пройдет третий VK Fest" . Российская газета (in Russian). 14 July 2017. Archived from the original on 7 March 2019 . Retrieved 12 November 2018 .
• Friedrichsen, Mike; Mühl-Benninghaus, Wolfgang, eds. (2013). Handbook of Social Media Management . Berlin: Springer. ISBN   978-3-642-28897-5 .

External links

• Google Buzz
• Tencent Weibo
• Activity stream
• Lifestreaming
• Backchannel
• Mention/Replies

• Companies based in Saint Petersburg
• Russian social networking websites
• 2006 establishments in Russia
• Internet properties established in 2006
• Notorious markets
• Russian brands
• Internet censorship in Ukraine
• Social media
• Russian websites
• CS1 Russian-language sources (ru)
• Webarchive template wayback links
• Articles with Ukrainian-language sources (uk)
• CS1 uses Russian-language script (ru)
• CS1 Ukrainian-language sources (uk)
• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Use dmy dates from February 2021
• Articles containing potentially dated statements from May 2021
• All articles containing potentially dated statements
• Articles containing Russian-language text
• Articles containing potentially dated statements from August 2018
• All articles that may contain original research
• Articles that may contain original research from March 2018
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from November 2020
• Commons category link from Wikidata

Try AI-powered search

• Japan’s porn industry comes out of the shadows

Politicians want to protect actors—but many want to be left alone

K URUMIN AROMA , a 33-year-old YouTuber who lives near Tokyo, used to dream of becoming a singer. A decade ago, a man approached her on the street and asked her to be a swimsuit model. He also offered to pay for singing classes and help her succeed in the entertainment business. After some cajoling, she agreed. On the day of the photo shoot, she was coaxed into getting naked. She ended up appearing in several porn videos. Beset by feelings of shame and fear, Ms Kurumin considered committing suicide. “I kept thinking: what went wrong with my life?”

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline “Regulating sex”

Asia August 26th 2023

• Australia is becoming America’s military launchpad into Asia
• Thailand’s new Thaksinist government
• The trials of Muhammad Yunus

From the August 26th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

More from Asia

Japan’s new prime minister, Ishiba Shigeru, is a popular gadfly

But will he able to govern effectively?

Ishiba Shigeru will become Japan’s next prime minister

The maverick won his fifth bid for leadership of the ruling party

Has the Quad lost its way?

Critics say the loose coalition is lowering its ambitions

How India can compete in labour-intensive manufacturing

Lessons from a superstar exporter

Who will become Japan’s next prime minister?

The three leading candidates offer very different visions

An upset in Sri Lanka propels an outsider into power

The new president leads a party with Marxist roots

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

• Upcoming Movies and TV shows
• Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
• Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

• About Rotten Tomatoes®
• Login/signup

Movies in theaters

• Opening This Week
• Top Box Office
• Coming Soon to Theaters
• Certified Fresh Movies

Movies at Home

• Fandango at Home
• Prime Video
• Most Popular Streaming Movies
• What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

• 97% The Wild Robot Link to The Wild Robot
• 83% The Outrun Link to The Outrun
• 100% Girls Will Be Girls Link to Girls Will Be Girls

New TV Tonight

• 82% The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon: Season 2
• 67% Joan: Season 1
• -- Heartstopper: Season 3
• -- Gremlins: The Wild Batch: Season 2
• 100% The Legend of Vox Machina: Season 3
• -- Chef's Table: Noodles: Season 1
• -- Last Days of the Space Age: Season 1
• -- Love Is Blind: Season 7
• -- Dandadan: Season 1
• -- Scare Tactics: Season 1

Most Popular TV on RT

• 94% Nobody Wants This: Season 1
• 94% The Penguin: Season 1
• 83% Agatha All Along: Season 1
• 100% From: Season 3
• 64% The Perfect Couple: Season 1
• 100% Brilliant Minds: Season 1
• 85% The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power: Season 2
• 75% Grotesquerie: Season 1
• 44% Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story: Season 2
• Best TV Shows
• Most Popular TV

Certified fresh pick

• 100% Matlock: Season 1 Link to Matlock: Season 1
• All-Time Lists
• Binge Guide
• Comics on TV
• Five Favorite Films
• Video Interviews
• Weekend Box Office
• Weekly Ketchup
• What to Watch

200 Best Horror Movies of All Time

Essential Slasher Movies

What to Watch: In Theaters and On Streaming

Awards Tour

Vote in the 1994 Movies Showdown – Round 3

3 Things to Know Before You Watch Joker: Folie à Deux

• Trending on RT
• Hispanic Heritage Month
• Spooky Season
• Movie Re-Release Calendar
• TV Premiere Dates

Where to Watch

Rent Porno on Fandango at Home, Prime Video, Apple TV, or buy it on Fandango at Home, Prime Video, Apple TV.

What to Know

Porno mines sexual repression to produce a laughably lurid -- and genuinely scary -- outing that should delight genre fans in search of a good time.

Critics Reviews

Audience reviews, cast & crew.

Keola Racela

Jillian Mueller

Katelyn Pearce

Bill Phillips

Peter Reznikoff

Lord Beekman

More Like This

Related movie news.

• News & Politics
• Science & Health
• Life Stories
• The New Sober Boom
• Getting Hooked on Quitting
• Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
• Is College Necessary?
• Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
• Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
• Bitcoin Gambling
• Bitcoin Casinos
• Bitcoin Sports Betting
• SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
• 'Dark' Personalities Drawn to BTC

7 places to find porn that's actually worth watching

There's no shortage of porn on the internet, but good porn that's another story. here are some places to look, by carrie weisman.

This article originally appeared on AlterNet .

1.  Hysterical Literature

It’s hard concentrating on two things at once, especially when one involves your clitoris. In attempts to document “the battle between the body and the mind,” NYC-based photographer Clayton Cubitt decided to film a series of women individually seated at a table with a book. When the camera begins recording, they introduce themselves and begin reading. Under the table, outside of the subject's control, an unseen assistant distracts them with a vibrator. The subjects stop reading when they're too distracted or fatigued to continue, at which point they restate their name and what they've just read.

It’s the best of nerd porn. Want to see that a woman is intelligent? Look to the passage she chose to read. Want to see that a woman is sexual? Look at her face as an invisible hand brings her to orgasm.

In the time since its 2012 launch, Cubitt’s work has been viewed over 45 million times in 200 countries.

2.  Antonio Da Silva Films

If there was ever a marriage between cinematography and pornography, it was officiated by Antonio Da Silva. “The penis can take part in poetry,” he's said. Da Silva uses his camera to expose the explicit sexual experiences of gay men. He’s covered the areas of cruising and public sex, Internet hookups, performance and voyeurism. He also throws in a bit of cinematic flare. You’d be surprised how horny the image of a slow-growing erection can leave you.

3. Beautiful Agony

One of the biggest critiques of mainstream porn is it’s too genitally focused. Beautiful Agony stands as a ”multimedia experiment ” to figure out just where eroticism in human imagery lies: the body or the face. They’re pushing for the latter.

To aid in the experiment, users submitted a series of videos showing their faces during orgasm. We’ve been conditioned to think that in order to get turned on by certain sex acts, we need to see the sex organs involved. Beautiful Agony proves that’s not always the case.

4.  Orgasmic Tips For Girls

This blog was designed to provide women the necessary resources they need to have killer orgasms. That means tips, links, images, video, personal stories and anything else that can help clear up the confusion. Featured posts range from different ways to  masturbate  to how to tell if you're having an  orgasm . The video section is full of material specifically selected on the basis of what women actually find hot. It’s one of the few places out there where the female gaze reigns supreme. “OT4G is a blog for horny girls everywhere,” the site claims. “It’s a place to get educated, reassured and maybe even turned on… and sometimes all three at once.” To date, the blog has over 150,000 followers.

5.  Kinbaku Luxuria

Those into the BDSM scene might want to head this way. Like so many other sexual niches , this one originated in Japan. “Kinbaku” refers to Japanese rope bondage. The term is often used interchangeably with the word “Shibari.” To get a better sense of what it’s all about, it might make sense to take a look at the language. Shibari literally means “to bind.” Kinbaku means “tight binding.” Insiders describe the experience as a “power exchange” through the use of ropes. Here, you can explore the scene through a variety of free photos and videos.

One participant provided a description of the experience, writing, “I smell the ropes before I feel them, the smell of bondage, submission, suffering, ecstasy. Then those telltale sounds… the rope being hit on the mat, being unwound, ready to be used. I wait silently, anticipating that first moment. Then his hands are on me, holding me in place while he begins to envelop me, the ropes an extension of him.”

The knots are elaborate and impressive. While the experience is largely erotic, there’s something extremely aesthetic about it as well.

6. Sounds of Pleasure

Arousal isn’t limited to vision. When it comes to sex, hearing what goes on can be just as exciting as seeing it. This platform provides visitors with an audio-based erotic experience. The clips range from masturbation sessions, partnered sex, jerk-off instructions, dirty talk and more. It’s a little bit like listening to neighbors have sex, but in a world where you can choose what they sound like, what they say and how long they last.

7.  I Feel Myself

They claim you can find “real, natural and ethical representations of female pleasure” on this site. These guys aren’t only interested in documenting the oft-overlooked female orgasm; they want to study it. They want to master it. Viewers can enjoy a series of solo (and sometimes partnered) masturbation sessions to get a better sense of what a female orgasm looks like and how to achieve it.

Carrie Weisman is an AlterNet staff writer who focuses on sex, relationships and culture. Got tips, ideas or a first-person story?  Email her . 

Related Topics ------------------------------------------

Related articles.

VK Video: shows, films, series 12+

Watch everything and more‪‬, v kontakte ooo.

• 4.6 • 900 Ratings

Screenshots

Description.

Watch movies, cartoons, TV series and shows online on any device. Enjoy premieres and blockbusters from movie theaters and online platforms right on your device! Discover entertainment without limits with VK Video. There, you’ll find online TV programs, new releases of films and TV series, educational and entertaining videos, cartoons for kids, exclusive content and sports broadcasts. Watch everything and more: • Regular headline premieres of Russian and foreign films, which are released on our platform before anywhere else • TV series that revolutionized the industry and became lasting classics, as well as trending new releases from different genres worthy of discovering • New episodes of your favorite shows • Sports broadcasts of current competitions • Family films and educational cartoons for kids • An extensive amount of original content • Your favorite TV channels online and live streams. Features for comfortable viewing: • Play premieres and blockbusters on any device! Start watching your favorite show on the VK Video app and continue watching it on your Smart TV or computer. • If you need to watch films on mute, simply turn on subtitles. • Watch TV series online without a subscription in background mode while taking care of other things. Background play works even when your phone’s screen is locked. • Smart search finds movies with synonyms and corrects typos for you. The VK Video showcase has thousands of videos, where you’re sure to find content that’s suited to you. Choose your interests out of the many topics so you can watch just what you like and what’s right for you! The personal feed is updated every day. Install the app and enjoy watching content. It has something for everyone: • Cartoons for kids • Films • TV channels • Sports broadcasts • Live streams • Shows • TV series online without a subscription • Videos from bloggers Do you have a talent for producing or directing? Start creating videos and upload them to your profile! Watch your favorite videos and send interesting content to your friends. On VK Video, you’ll have access to films, cartoons for kids, TV channels, new videos, live streams, sports broadcasts and TV series online without a subscription.

Version 1.40

We’ve added automatic sign-in. This way, you don’t have to enter your credentials again if you’ve already signed into any VK app on the device.

Ratings and Reviews

900 Ratings

iPad please

We need version for iPad

Developer Response ,

Вы просили — мы сделали. Спешим поделиться — уже вышла новая версия приложения для iPad. Мы тщательно проанализировали отзывы пользователей и постарались сделать всё возможное, чтобы создать особую среду, в которой вы сможете наслаждаться интересным контентом и с радостью проводить время. Благодарим вас за обратную связь — именно она служит мотивацией для создания наших лучших продуктов.

US cell number

Hello. I live in the states and my US phone number can’t be used to log in and create an account. When will the fix come?

Arabic language

It is possible to add Arabic language to the application

NOW AVAILABLE

App privacy.

The developer, V Kontakte OOO , indicated that the app’s privacy practices may include handling of data as described below. For more information, see the developer’s privacy policy .

Data Used to Track You

The following data may be used to track you across apps and websites owned by other companies:

• Contact Info
• Identifiers

Data Linked to You

The following data may be collected and linked to your identity:

• User Content

Data Not Linked to You

The following data may be collected but it is not linked to your identity:

• Search History
• Diagnostics

Privacy practices may vary, for example, based on the features you use or your age. Learn More

Information

English, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Belarusian, Kazakh, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Ukrainian, Uzbek

• App Support
• Privacy Policy

More By This Developer

VK: social network, messenger

Email App – Mail

Cloud: 1 drive - more storage

VK Messenger: Live chat, calls

VK Music: playlists & podcasts

Юла: объявления рядом

You Might Also Like

Boosty: Content just for fans

Дзен — видео, ролики, статьи

START: онлайн-кинотеатр

Большое ТВ: Русские фильмы HD

Kaver: Events, Places, Tickets

Кинопоиск: просмотр фильмов

Copyright © 2024 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.

Not OK on VK An Analysis of In-Platform Censorship on Russia’s VKontakte

Перевод на русский

Key findings

• This report examines the accessibility of certain types of content on VK (an abbreviation for “VKontakte”), a Russian social networking service, in Canada, Ukraine, and Russia.
• Among these countries, we found that Russia had the most limited access to VK social media content, due to the blocking of 94,942 videos, 1,569 community accounts, and 787 personal accounts in the country.
• VK predominantly blocked access to music videos and other entertainment content in Canada, whereas, in Russia, we found VK blocked content posted by independent news organizations, as well as content related to Ukrainian and Belarusian issues, protests, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) content. In Ukraine, we discovered no content that VK blocked, though the site itself is blocked to varying extents by most Internet providers in Ukraine.
• In Russia, certain types of video content were inaccessible on VK due to the blocking of the accounts of the people or communities who posted them. These individuals and groups were often targeted for their criticism of Russia’s President Vladimir Putin or of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Additionally, accounts belonging to these communities and people have been restricted from VK search results in Russia using broad, keyword-based blocking of LGBTIQ terms.
• We collected over 300 legal justifications which VK cited in justification of the blocking of videos in Russia. Notably, we discovered a 30-fold increase in the rate of takedown orders issued against VK in an eight month period following Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Introduction

While China is known for fostering its own ecosystem of social media platforms such as the chat app WeChat and microblogging platform Weibo and blocking their American counterparts (e.g., WhatsApp and Twitter), Russia has allowed access to WhatsApp and Twitter, but has also put a considerable effort into deploying and promoting Russian equivalents. For example, VK and Odnoklassniki , which are roughly Facebook equivalents, Rutube , a Russian equivalent of YouTube , and Yandex which is equivalent to Google Search . In 2022, Runniversalis , a pro-Kremlin version of Wikipedia was launched, reminiscent of Chinese efforts such as Baidu Baike to create a domestic clone of Wikipedia. Although many North American social media platforms remain accessible in Russia, Russia eventually blocked Facebook and Twitter following the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Chinese social media platforms, which are known to apply pervasive political and religious censorship to their Chinese users, take a variety of approaches to treating their non-Chinese users who may have different expectations concerning freedom of speech. While many platforms such as Weibo apply their political censorship even to users outside of China, others such as WeChat, in a bid to try to appeal to non-Chinese users, apply fewer speech restrictions to them. Other companies, such as Bytedance, take the approach of maintaining distinct platforms inside China ( Douyin ) versus elsewhere ( TikTok ). Like Chinese platforms, Russian platforms are also known to perform political censorship. However, the mechanisms the latter use to apply censorship, what topics they censor, and if or how those mechanisms apply to users outside of Russia are issues that are still understudied in the research on information controls.

Internet censorship in Russia is enforced through a variety of legal mechanisms. The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor) , as the Internet regulator, maintains a centralized “blacklist” governing the blocking of IP addresses, domain names, and unencrypted HTTP URLs, which Internet service providers (ISPs) in Russia are legally obliged to implement. However, the censorship of social media content, which, due to HTTPS encryption, cannot be individually blocked by ISPs, is maintained through other legal mechanisms such as court orders . Multiple government (e.g., the Roskomnadzor and the office of the Prosecutor General) and non-government agencies (e.g., Rosmolodezh, the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs) can apply for a court order to have websites blocked, in which they typically appeal to one of Russia’s multiple laws governing Internet content. These laws often contain vague terms concerning the content they prohibit, including “ нарушением установленного порядка ” [violation of the established order], “ нецензурную брань ” [obscene language], “ явное неуважение к… органам, осуществляющим государственную власть в Российской Федерации ” [blatant disrespect for… bodies exercising state power in the Russian Federation], and “ Пропаганда нетрадиционных сексуальных отношений и (или) предпочтений ” [propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations and (or) preferences]. These laws have been used to justify political censorship of Internet content, particularly content critical of Putin or other Russian leadership, and to justify the restriction of the rights of LGBTIQ communities. Furthermore, according to a law which went into effect in February 2021, social media platforms are required to implement blocking proactively , as opposed to merely in response to court orders. Previous research studying Chinese social media censorship has shown how deferring blocking decisions to the private sector gives rise to inconsistent blocking across companies, with platforms often “overblocking” to ensure that they have covered all of the bases to avoid legal repercussions for insufficiently blocking content.

In this report, we study VKontakte [ВКонтакте], commonly abbreviated as “VK,” which is the most popular social media platform in Russia. VK is similar to Facebook in that it provides personal accounts, messaging, music and video hosting, and other community features. The platform is divided into three broad organizational categories: videos, communities or clubs, and people. VK has a complicated history concerning Russian censorship. The platform was founded in 2006 by Pavel Durov, who is also known for founding Telegram Messenger . Durov was dismissed as VK’s chief executive officer (CEO) in 2014, allegedly for failing to hand over the data of Russian political protesters to the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), the country’s security agency. Durov was also targeted for failing to ban a VK community advocating for Alexei Navalny, a political opponent of Putin. Durov additionally claimed that the platform had come under “ full control ” of “Kremlin insiders” after the platform was sold to Alisher Usmanov, an oligarch loyal to Putin. In 2021, VK’s then-CEO Boris Dobrodeev resigned following the takeover of the company by state-owned companies. Analysts speculated that this state takeover could lead to “ greater interference ” by the Russian government.

In addition to criticism due to censorship, VK has been criticized by the digital security community as a platform that is unsafe for activists. This allegation was made on account of the personal information which it collects and due to VK joining the Register of Organizers of Distribution of Information in the Internet Network, a special list of platforms that must provide user data on request to the FSB and Russian police. Several waves of “exodus” of users from VK have been documented — the earliest one corresponding to the year of Durov’s departure — due to fears of government surveillance and legal harassment.

In this work, we are interested in measuring how VK implements political censorship in the context of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine that began in February 2022. Our research includes identifying what mechanisms VK uses to enforce censorship, what type of content is censored, and if or how this censorship applies to users outside of Russia. Specifically, we measure the accessibility of content on VK from different countries or vantage points to uncover instances of differential censorship , i.e., content which is censored in one region but not another. This allows us, for example, to determine which content is visible in Canada but not in Russia, and vice versa. In this report, we focus on comparing content availability from Russia, Ukraine, and Canada.

The remainder of this report is structured as follows: In the “Methodology” section, we detail our methods for uncovering VK’s differing censorship across countries, and, in “Experimental setup,” we explain the conditions and implementation details in which we executed these methods. Furthermore, in “Results,” we reveal our findings concerning the pervasive political and social censorship which VK applies to users in Russia. In “Limitations,” we review the limitations of our experiment, and finally, in “Discussion,” we discuss how our findings contribute to a greater understanding of Internet censorship in Russia and how Russian social media censorship compares to censorship elsewhere.

Methodology

This section details our methodology for measuring differential censorship on VK across Canada, Ukraine, and Russia. We conducted our research entirely without registration of or interaction with any user accounts on the VK platform. Instead, we tested access from network vantage points in the regions that we chose to compare, comparing the differences in what content was accessible in each region on VK’s website. This method ensures that we can conduct our testing without obtaining SIM cards or phone numbers, without worrying about account termination, and without the ethical concerns of creating or transmitting content over the platform.

To test for differential censorship on VK, and to ensure that we have a diverse sample of popular, easily enumerable topics to query, we sampled from Wikipedia article titles. We began by selecting the following six language editions of Wikipedia: Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Georgian, Chechen, and Kazakh. We selected these language editions because VK is a Russian platform, and these are languages commonly spoken both within and in areas surrounding Russia. For each of these Wikipedia language editions, we independently sorted their articles by the total number of views that they had during January, February, and March 2023, sorting them in descending order of popularity. In our testing, we drew from across these six sorted lists in a round-robin fashion such that we tested the same number of articles from each language edition of Wikipedia.

In this work, we are interested in comparing the availability of VK content across Canada, a liberal democracy where we are based, as well as Russia and Ukraine, the countries with the first and third largest number of visitors to VK, respectively. VK allows for searching for videos, communities (also called groups or clubs), and people. As such, for each article title that we tested, we performed nine search queries simultaneously on the VK website. For each of the countries of Canada, Ukraine, and Russia and for each of the videos, communities, and people search targets, we queried the article title on that search target in that country. For each of these nine combinations, we recorded the number of search results for the query.

As we noticed that VK would on occasion spuriously report a smaller number of results than what it ordinarily would for a query, we implemented the following retest procedure. Twenty-four hours following an original query, we repeated searching the query from the same vantage point on the same search target. We then recorded whichever is greater of the number of results reported in the retest and the number of results reported in the original test.

Next, we sought to establish some threshold under which we could label the search result numbers from two different regions as suspiciously different. We noticed that comparing absolute numbers favored finding queries which had large numbers of results as suspiciously different, whereas comparing by the percent difference favored finding queries which had small numbers of results as suspiciously different. As such, to test whether the number of search results x from one region is suspiciously less than the number of results y from another region, we employ the following statistical heuristic. We noticed early on by analyzing the initial results between Canada and Ukraine that they were consistent modulo random fluctuation. In an early sample, we saw that in 132 of the tests there were eight which had a different number of results, each with a difference of one. As we did not know the variables affecting these random fluctuations (i.e., is or to what extent is the size of the fluctuation proportional to the number of results?), we chose 8/132 as a clear upper bound for the proportion of results we would find missing by chance. Using a one-sided chi-squared test, we then performed a test of difference in proportions, namely, the hypothesis that ( x – y ) / x ≤ 8/132. If we reject this hypothesis, with p < 0.001 probability that such a difference in proportions could have arisen by chance, we conclude that x is suspiciously missing results compared to y .

For search result numbers that seemed to be suspiciously missing results, we further explored which content was missing from their results. Since VK only allows revealing up to 999 search results for a query, we limited our investigation to queries with fewer than 1,000 results. For any number of results x and number of results y , if x < 1,000, y < 1,000, and either x or y are suspiciously missing results compared to the other, we downloaded all of the search results for both x and y and recorded which were missing from each.

For each result missing from our case studies, to better understand why that video, community, or person was missing from the results for that country, we attempted to access that result from the region in which it was missing. For example, we attempted to access the result using both the desktop (vk.com) and mobile (m.vk.com) versions of the VK website. We recorded any error message or other block message which was displayed to the user. Specifically for missing video results, we attempted to access additional pages from that country. A video on VK can be associated with an individual poster, a community poster, or both. To better understand why videos are missing, we also attempted to access their individual and community posters and recorded any error or block message displayed on their pages. We attempted access to these pages using both the desktop (vk.com) and mobile (m.vk.com) versions of the site.

Experimental setup

We implemented the above methodology in Python using the aiohttp and SciPy modules and executed the code on an Ubuntu 22.04 Linux machine. We performed this experiment from April 17 through May 13, 2023. Our Canadian measurements were performed from a University of Toronto network. Our Russian and Ukrainian measurements were performed through WireGuard tunnels, as provided by a popular VPN service offering Russian and Ukrainian vantage points. In light of VK being blocked to varying extents on most Ukrainian networks due to a ban of the site, we confirmed that our Ukrainian vantage point had access to VK before performing our experiments (see Appendix A for our analysis of Ukraine’s ban of VK).

During our testing period, we tested on VK the accessibility of the titles of the top 127,187 articles in each of the Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Georgian, Chechen, and Kazakh language Wikipedias. Together, this sample set comprised 708,346 unique article titles. By measuring what content was blocked in VK search queries for these titles, we found differential blocking of videos in Canada, as well as of videos, communities, and personal accounts in Russia, although the motives for the blocking of videos in Canada versus Russia appeared starkly different, as we explain below. We also found that in Russia, search query results for communities and people were censored by keyword, whereas in Canada we found no such filtering.

Notably, we found no in-platform differential blocking carried out by VK in Ukraine compared to Canada or in Ukraine compared to Russia. Since we did not discover any content that was accessible in Canada or Russia but that was inaccessible in Ukraine, in the remainder of this section, we will focus on comparing differential blocking in Russia compared to Canada and vice versa. We first provide an overview of our findings and detail the different blocking mechanisms that VK uses. We then use data analysis techniques to better understand the blocked content that we discovered, such as what type of content was blocked, what events precipitated its blocking, or what legal justifications did VK cite in its blocking.

Blocking overview and mechanisms

From our results, we were able to infer that VK used multiple methods of blocking. The primary method seen was the blocking or removal of certain search results. For content missing in Canada, for example, we saw no missing personal account results. Nine communities were missing from Canadian search results, but the results themselves were still accessible in Canada by typing the URLs for the communities’ pages, and there did not appear to be anything about them that would suggest why they might be removed from search results. As such, we believe that they were false positives in that they were missing from the search results for completely benign reasons such as different load balancers or caching servers possessing inconsistent views of the same data. Aside from a small number of what also seemed to be false positives, all of the 2,613 videos tested in Canada that were missing from the search results showed either a “This video is unavailable in your country” or a “Video sound unavailable” block message. These videos appeared to all be popular sports, music, and other entertainment videos posted by ordinary users and, when considering the explanation given in their block messages, these videos were likely blocked in Canada for copyright infringement. These videos, however, were still available in Russia. Our hypothesis is that this differing treatment of copyright-infringing content could be explained by the overall inconsistent way that VK enforces copyright law across multiple regions.

Table 1: For each region, for each content type, the methods of blocking which we discovered.

We observed more diverse methods and motivations behind content being unavailable in Russia (see Table 1 for a summary). When searching for communities and people, we observed that VK disabled search results if the search query contained certain LGBTIQ-related keywords (see Figure 1 for an illustration and Table 2 for a list of the keywords which we discovered triggering filtering). While it applied for searches for communities and people, this keyword-based censorship of search queries did not appear to apply to searches for videos.

Table 2: Keywords censoring search queries for communities and people in Russia.

Aside from VK’s keyword-based filtering of searches for community and personal accounts, VK also directly blocked individual community and personal accounts, which also hides them from search results and displays a block message when viewing the account’s page. In fact, blocking community and personal accounts appears to be VK’s primary method of censoring videos in Russia. Outside of 134 videos which displayed no block message and which we believe to be false positives, the remaining 94,942 videos missing from search results showed a block message on the desktop version of VK such as “This video is unavailable because its creator has been blocked.” We confirmed that all of these videos were blocked due to the community or person who had posted the video being blocked, because when we attempted to view the community or the account that posted these videos, we received a block message that mentioned a court order for the blocking.

To justify the blocking of communities and personal accounts in Russia, we observed 336 unique VK block messages citing 303 different legal case numbers. An example of such a block message is as follows: “Этот материал заблокирован на территории РФ на основании решения суда/уполномоченного федерального органа исполнительной власти (Центральный районный суд г. Хабаровска – Хабаровский край) от 10.08.2015 № 2-5951/2015” [This material was blocked in the territory of the Russian Federation on the basis of the decision of the court / authorized federal executive body (Central District Court of Khabarovsk – Khabarovsk Territory) dated 10.08.2015 No. 2-5951/2015]. In instances where information is publicly available, these legal cases appear to be takedown requests filed by Russian prosecutors or other actors, which appeal to varying Russian laws for justification. For example, in the case cited in the aforementioned block message, the Russian prosecutor appeals to Article 4 of a Russian law “ On Mass Media ” to ask the court to order the takedown of content on VK which allegedly uses obscene language to refer to Vladimir Putin.

We also rarely observed other error messages which were not block messages such as “Please sign in to view this video,” “Access to this video has been restricted by its creator,” and “This page has either been deleted or not been created yet.” These messages were not indicative of blocking but rather would occur if content were deleted or restricted at the poster’s discretion during our testing process. Therefore, we did not consider such content with these error messages to be blocked. See Table 3 for a breakdown of the types of error messages which we observed.

Table 3: Breakdown of types of error messages, examples of them, where they have been observed, and whether they are block messages identifying differential blocking.

While earlier we found blocked communities and personal accounts due to their results missing in search results, we can also find them from looking to see who posted blocked videos. Working backward from blocked videos to find the blocked communities or personal accounts who posted them, we found an additional 826 communities and 768 personal accounts blocked in Russia. Together with 804 blocked communities and 19 blocked personal accounts directly missing from community and people search results, we found 1,569 unique communities and 787 unique personal accounts blocked in Russia (see Table 4 for a summary of all content blocked).

Table 4: For each region, for each content type, the number of blocked instances of that content type in that region. For communities and personal accounts, we further break down the number we discovered from their absence in search results versus for having posted a blocked video.

While we have given a brief overview of the types of blocking methods on VK, as well as the amount of content subject to each type of blocking across different regions, in the remainder of this section we will perform a deeper analysis of the type of content blocked on VK. We will first characterize blocked videos in Canada and Russia according to the search queries from whose results they were missing, the posters of the blocked videos, and a random sampling of the blocked video contents themselves. Then, we analyze the block messages and legal justifications which VK communicates to the user upon attempting to view blocked content.

Analysis of blocked videos

In this section, we characterize blocked videos according to the search queries from whose results they were missing, the posters of the blocked videos, and a random sampling of the contents of the blocked videos themselves.

What search queries discovered blocked videos?

Recall that, during our testing, we took popular Wikipedia article titles from multiple language editions of Wikipedia and used them to search for videos, communities, and personal accounts on the VK website, to see if and to what extent these search results were blocked in one region versus another. In this section, we are specifically interested in the search queries that led to the discovery of large numbers of blocked videos, as such queries can signal the type of content blocked on VK. We call such queries productive queries .

Videos blocked in Russia

Among the top ten most productive queries (i.e., those leading to the discovery of the greatest number of blocked videos), we see that most are related to the Ukraine war (“Учасники російсько української війни Ш” [Participants of the Russian-Ukrainian war], “Пропаганда війни в Росії” [Propaganda of War in Russia]) and international bodies that are involved in mediating the conflict (“Генеральна Асамблея ООН” [UN General Assembly], “Міжнародний суд ООН” [International Court of Justice]).

The most productive queries in Russia can be understood to be indirectly related to the war such as “Secret Invasion,” derived from a Wikipedia article for a Marvel comic series turned TV show, but nevertheless uncovering blocked content related to the Ukrainian “invasion” more broadly, and “Катэгорыя 24 лютага” [Category: February 24], the title of a Wikipedia article listing holidays on February 24 but which is also the day of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. There are also productive queries related to Ukraine more generally such as “Поліський район” [Polskiiy District], a former administrative region in Kyiv Oblast, and the anthem of Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zeleskyys home town “Кривий Ріг” [Kryvyi Rih]. We also found one term related to a news service in Belarus (“БелаПАН” [BelaPAN]), as well as one term which appeared unrelated to the conflict (“Чорні троянди” [Black Roses]) but upon closer inspection we discovered that it was the name of a blocked Ukrainian pro-military group which had posted a large number of videos.

Table 5: The ten most productive queries in Russia, i.e., those which we tested which discovered the most blocked videos in Russia.

Videos blocked in Canada

In contrast to the test results from Russia, the most productive queries in Canada did not deal with the Ukraine war but rather sports, music, and geographic locations. Most of the queries (six in ten) are related to sports including: The Davis Cup (in Russian and Belarusian), World Figure Skating Championships, and three different soccer players (Ciro Immobile, Alejandro Gomez, and Duván Zapata). There are also queries related to music (K Ci & JoJo and Beatles Bootleg Recordings) and geographic locations (Locust and Charleroi). The queries that led to blocked content in Canada are different from those in Russia and are more focused on entertainment rather than current events.

Table 6: The top ten most productive queries in Canada, i.e., those which we tested which discovered the most blocked videos in Canada.

What languages are blocked videos in?

In the previous section, we looked at the search queries that led to the discovery of large numbers of blocked videos. In this section, we perform a similar analysis but based on which language edition of Wikipedia the search query was from. Our purpose is to see which Wikipedia language edition’s article titles led to the largest numbers of blocked videos. We do this to better understand the languages of the video content blocked on VK.

Among videos blocked in Russia, we find that queries from the Ukrainian language Wikipedia discovered the largest share (61%) of blocked video results, followed by Belarusian (36%), with Russian at a distant third (1%). All remaining languages (Kazakh, Chechen and Georgian) accounted for less than 0.3% each. Seeing a disproportionately large amount of Ukrainian content blocked is surprising because, after VK’s 2017 blocking in Ukraine , average daily visits from Ukrainian users dropped from 54% of Ukrainian Internet users to only 10% of Ukrainian Internet users visiting VK on a given day. Moreover, despite VK being a Russian social media platform, Russian language queries in Russia led to the discovery of only a small share of blocked videos (1.33%). However, these findings may merely speak to the effectiveness of VK’s censorship regime at disincentivizing Russians and, therefore, largely Russian speaking users to engage in censored speech. Furthermore, the social cost of being blocked in Russia is greater for Russians than for those outside of Russia, again further disincentivizing sensitive political speech for users in Russia.

Table 7: For videos found blocked in Russia, the number of videos discovered via queries originating from which language edition of Wikipedia.

In contrast to Russia, which blocked a large share of videos queried using titles article from the Ukrainian language Wikipedia, the language composition of the queries that led to the discovery of blocked videos in Canada is markedly different. Among the videos blocked in Canada, the Russian language is most represented in our data set with 43.44% share of results, followed by Kazakh (20.47%) and Georgian (13.89%) All remaining languages (Ukrainian, Chechen, and Belarusian) have less than a ten percent share. In Canada, Russian is far more represented (43.34% in Canada compared to 1.33% in Russia). This finding is more in line with expectations as VK is a Russian social media platform with a predominantly Russian user base and, therefore, such a platform would contain more Russian language content in requirement of moderation than any other language.

These findings reflect VK’s differing motivations in blocking videos in Russia versus Canada. In Russia, VK appears motivated to block content that primarily contains certain political views, which are often expressed by Ukrainian and Belarusian speakers. However, in Canada, VK blocks content that contains copyright infringement, which we would expect to be committed by speakers of different languages of equal frequency. As VK is a Russian platform we therefore would expect to see higher absolute numbers of Russians moderated due to their greater representation on the platform.

Table 8: For videos found blocked in Canada, the number of videos discovered via queries originating from which language edition of Wikipedia.

Who posted blocked videos?

Next, we review who posted the largest share of the most blocked content that we discovered on VK to get a sense of the individuals or entities whose content is most affected by VK’s blocking and what they are posting. We divide our examination into two different user types per country: videos that were posted by personal accounts and those posted by communities. It should be noted that some community pages may have the branding of a company but it is not always clear if these are officially operated accounts. VK offers a verification system for companies and brands, but verification is optional, and some companies may be unaware or unwilling to go through this process. In our discussion, we will mention whether a company is verified.

Videos blocked in Russia posted by personal accounts

From examining the videos that were blocked in Russia, we discovered 1,429 personal accounts that were blocked in the country. Among these, one poster named “ Oleg Skripnik ” accounts for an outsized portion (37%) of the blocked videos that we discovered, followed by “ Daryna Ivaniv ” (12%) and “ Podryv Ustoev ” (4%). These top three posters account for 53% of all videos that we discovered were posted by blocked personal accounts, underscoring how a small number of posters are overrepresented in terms of video blocking. Among the personal accounts that were blocked, the majority of these accounts post political content only occasionally and cannot be described as accounts primarily used for activism. A few personal accounts that were blocked seem to belong to the Ukrainian military and are still active. This finding shows that, regardless of wide criticism of VK as an insecure, pro-Russian platform, and, in spite of its blocking in Ukraine (see Appendix A), it is still used by many Ukrainians including those currently on the frontlines.

Table 9: The ten personal accounts which we discovered with the most blocked videos in Russia.

In addition to the 1,429 blocked personal accounts found via blocked videos, when we directly searched different article titles within the “People” category, we found an additional 19 blocked personal accounts due to being missing from our search query results. These additional accounts are all related to the Praviy Sektor, which is a Ukrainian nationalist group, except one account titled “Femboy Developer” (see Table 10).

Table 10: The profiles of the additional 19 blocked personal accounts which we discovered from their absence in search queries.

Videos blocked in Russia posted by communities

We discovered 826 communities blocked by VK in Russia from the videos they posted, which were also blocked in Russia. Ten of these blocked communities are ranked below in Table 11 by the number of videos which we discovered blocked that were posted by them. These communities include those focused on news (“Ploscha”) and Ukrainian and Belarusian patriotic communities (“My Country Belarus,” “My Ukraine,” and “Patriots of Ukraine”). One account was of a regional Ukrainian television station Channel 1 – Urban First [Канал 1 – Первый Городской] . There are also accounts of oppositional media focused on Belarus, such as Belsat TV , Radio Svoboda and European Radio for Belarus . Among these, Belsat TV and Radio Svoboda are state funded by Poland and the United States, respectively, while European Radio for Belarus is independent. Of these accounts, only the account of European Radio for Belarus is “verified” through VK, although all of these groups post content from their respective community pages.

Table 11: The ten communities which we discovered with the most blocked videos in Russia.

Outside of these top ten communities, there are other communities blocked, including Ukrainian media outlets such as Hromadske [Громадське ] and BBC News Ukrainian , and a Belarusian opposition newspaper Nasha Niva [Наша Ніва] . The verified community of the team of Alexei Navalny is also blocked. We also found sport-related communities such as “FC Shakhtar” (a fan page of the Football Club Shakhtar from Donetsk) and By.Tribuna.com (the Belarusian branch of an international sport media Tribuna ) among the results.

In addition to the 826 blocked communities which we found via their blocked videos, when we directly searched different article titles within the “Communities” category, we found an additional 804 blocked communities due to being missing from our search query results. We present the ten queries which led to the discovery of the most blocked communities in Russia in Table 12.

Table 12: The ten queries which we tested which discovered the most blocked communities in Russia.

The query, which led to the discovery of the most censored communities, is related to the sale of Neodymium magnets (“Неодимовый магнит”), accounting for over 8% of the communities which we discovered blocked. The content of these community pages indicates that these are rare earth magnets that are marketed as being able to tamper with water and gas meters. One group’s description claims that using these magnets for this purpose are prohibited by law, which suggests the lack of consistent legal enforcement in these communities. Many of the other search queries are also related to potential scams, such as the arranging of fake marriages (“Фиктивный брак”), sports wagering, pill sales, and diet supplements. There are blocked communities of racist and nationalist groups present as well. There are also communities related to pro-USSR regionalist groups (e.g., Community of the KNVR of the Udmurt Region [Община КНВР Удмуртского Региона]). Finally, many of the queries and their blocked groups are critical of the government and insulting of Putin, as many are titled with the anti-Putin slogan “Пуцін хуйло” which translates to “Putin is a dick.”

The blocked communities appear to have a different content focus compared to blocked videos. Whereas blocked video content in Russia is largely related to the Ukraine war and Belarus, blocked communities are focused on potential scams. There is some crossover, however, as racist, nationalist content is blocked in both videos and communities within Russia.

Videos blocked in Canada posted by personal accounts

In contrast to Russia, within the top ten personal accounts that posted the most blocked videos in Canada, all except one primarily posted music content (see Table 13). There were no videos containing political or current events that were posted by the top ten posters in Canada. This result is, again, a departure from what was seen in Russia. Hence, VK in Canada focuses more on blocking entertainment content for what is most likely copyright-related justifications.

Table 13: The ten personal accounts which we discovered with the most blocked videos in Canada.

Videos blocked in Canada posted by communities

This trend of the blocking of entertainment content holds in Canada for communities which posted videos that were blocked in Canada. Six of the ten blocked community video posters focused on sports, three on music, and one on cartoons. There is a focus on Russian media producer channels as well, including TV ( Tele Sport , Okko Sport , and Match Premier ) and radio ( OMSK 103.9 FM ). This content is different from blocked community posters in Russia which does include media but focused primarily on politics and current events ( Belsat , Radio Svoboda , and Euradio ).

Table 14: The ten communities which we discovered with the most blocked videos in Canada.

What content is in blocked videos?

Due to the high number of blocked videos which we discovered, it would be infeasible for us to watch and categorize all the content. Instead, to capture the general themes of blocked content, we randomly sampled 30 videos that were blocked in Russia and 30 videos that were blocked in Canada, watched them, and categorized them according to their content.

Among the 30 sampled blocked videos in Russia, we find that the largest share (43%) are videos related to the Ukraine war. The videos reviewed include war footage, demonstrations of military ordnance, interviews with service members, and talk shows discussing the war. The next largest category of blocked content concerns videos related to Belarus (26%), which include videos of protests, as well as news coverage of deaths, detentions, and tragedies. The third most observed category of blocked content is non-war Ukrainian content (13%), which includes news coverage of economic issues and nationalist marches.

Table 15: Categories of blocked videos in Russia from our randomly selected sample.

We also randomly sampled 30 videos blocked in Canada and categorized their content. In contrast to the categories blocked in Russia, which were largely related to the Ukraine war and Belarus, blocked content in Canada is more related to entertainment, specifically sports (57%), music (40%), and television programming (3%). These categories reflect that the primary motive around blocking in Canada is related to copyright enforcement. There is a complete absence of any political, news, or current events content blocked in Canada, which are categories that dominate the sample of blocked videos in Russia. These findings again indicate that the aim of censorship within Canada is very different from within Russia, with the former being focused on copyright and the latter on news, current events, and politics.

Table 16: Categories of blocked videos in Canada from our randomly selected sample.

Block messages communicated to users

In this section, we review the block messages that are communicated to users when they try to visit blocked content pages in Russia and Canada. We find that all content that is blocked in one region but available in another presents a message to users that explains the reason why the content is unavailable.

We discovered 336 unique messages communicated to users when they try to access blocked content in Russia. All but one message cites a Russian court order as a justification for the block. The one message observed that does not cite a Russian court order is the more general message, “This video is unavailable in your country,” which affected five videos. The remaining 335 messages are in Russian and they explain in a similar format that the video is blocked in the Russian Federation, as well as mention who requested the block, and the associated case number and date.

Despite there being over three hundred block messages which we discovered, the ten most frequently observed messages account for a large majority (77.15%) of blocked videos. The message that we observed justifying the largest number of blocked videos (33,252 videos or 35%) was requested by the General Prosecutor’s Office, citing case number “27-31-2020/Ид2145-22,” and dated February 24, 2022. Although we were unable to find the text of this court decision, this same case number was cited by the Russian communications regulator, Roskomnadzor, to block 6,037 websites , and, given its timing, we presume that it is related to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Table 17: The ten block messages which we discovered to block the most videos in Russia.

The earliest court date mentioned in a block message was March 2, 2014, and the most recent was April 28, 2023, which was shortly before our testing period ended on May 14, 2023. This range covers a wide time period spanning 8 years and 11 months. Reviewing the cumulative distribution of the cited court case date in the messages, we see that there was an uptick in the rate of cited case dates after February 24, 2022 (see Figure 8 and Table 18), which coincides with the day that Russia began its full-scale invasion into Ukraine. Prior to this period, there was a steady and relatively consistent rate of dates mentioned in the justification. This increased pace diminished beginning late October or early November, 2022, until the end of our test period in May 2023. There also exists a gap in which no cases were cited from December 26, 2022, to January 26, 2023, although this may be explainable at least in part by the observance of the Eastern Orthodox Christmas holiday season. The reason for the brief period of diminished pace and gap is unclear. Overall the timing of these changes suggests that the ongoing conflict has dramatically increased the rate of blocking of video content for Russian users.

Table 18: Comparison of rate of court orders during three time periods.

In contrast, among the videos blocked in Canada, there are no messages returned to users citing any legal justification for blocked content. The only two block messages which we observed justifying blocked videos in Canada are the more general message of “This video is unavailable in your country” (87.56%) and “Video sound unavailable” (12.44%). It is a common practice in social media moderation to restrict sound when that sound contains copyrighted music content. These messages in Canada are a stark difference from the messages seen in Russia which are more varied and which overwhelmingly cite a court order.

Table 19: The two block messages which we discovered justifying blocked videos in Canada.

Limitations

In this section, we discuss some of the limitations of our methodology. First, our methods only uncover differential censorship (i.e., censorship which is present in one region but not another). Our methods cannot uncover censorship which VK applies to all regions or countries of the world. It is likely that this report undercounts censorship and other forms of moderation carried out on the platform, as we have no visibility into deletions of content that would apply to all regions.

To illustrate this limitation, at the time of this writing, we are aware of at least seven instances of Russian-court ordered takedowns being applied outside of Russia. First is the account of Yevgeny Prigozhin, which when we browsed it on June 26, 2023, from either Canada, Ukraine, or Russia, displayed a block message citing a court order , dated June 24, 2023 (see Figure 9). On June 24, 2023, Prigozhin, the founder and leader of the Wagner mercenary group, led a mutiny and marched toward Moscow, which ended abruptly when the mercenary agreed to leave Russia for Belarus. There are six other accounts that we found blocked and that displayed this block message which are also related to Wagner Group:

• https://vk.com/obozrenie_svo
• https://vk.com/chvk.vaqner
• https://vk.com/wagner2022org
• https://vk.com/wagner_svo
• https://vk.com/orkestrwagnera
• https://vk.com/orchestrawagnera

It is unclear why VK blocked these Wagner Group-associated pages in Canada. In the block message, there is no explanation of these accounts violating any VK terms of service or safety guidelines . The only justification given is a Russian court order and a request from Roskomnadzor, which should only apply to users based in Russia. While pages related to the Wagner Group are the only examples of Russian court-ordered blocking being applied to users broadly outside of Russia that we are aware of, there may exist other instances of blocking which we have not discovered.

A second limitation of our work is that we did not perform testing from accounts which were signed in. As a consequence, we were neither able to receive search results for nor view videos which the poster of the video configured to only be visible to signed-in users. However, we do not believe this limitation to influence the direction of our findings in any meaningful way.

Another limitation of our work is that our methodology limited us to finding missing results in search queries whose results had fewer than 1,000 results. This limitation does not strictly mean that we cannot detect blocked content when it appears in the results of a query with at least 1,000 results, but it does mean that we will have to detect such content by its absence in a more narrow query. We believe that our large query sample size ameliorates this limitation, and we do not believe this limitation to skew the direction of our findings in any meaningful way.

Finally, as we tested the titles of the most popular articles on multiple language editions of Wikipedia, our methods are biased toward finding blocked videos, communities, and people related to popular topics on Wikipedia in these language editions. As an example, topics on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine were popular in the Ukrainian language Wikipedia during January, February, and March 2023. As we tested the titles of the most popular articles on Ukrainian Wikipedia during this period, we incidentally tested a large number of queries related to the Ukraine war. While it is possible that this topic is popular on VK for the same reasons it is popular on the Ukrainian language Wikipedia, it is also possible that we are oversampling such videos on VK due to our large number of test queries related to this topic.

In this section, we conclude by discussing how our findings contribute to a greater understanding of Russian social media censorship in Russia and how it compares to censorship abroad. Finally, we compare the Russian approach to social media censorship to the Chinese model of social media censorship.

Broad keyword-based blocking of LGBTIQ content

While much of the analysis we performed was on blocked videos, communities, and personal accounts, we also discovered that searches for communities and personal accounts in Russia were censored when their search queries contained keywords related to LGBTIQ content (see Table 2). We found that the use of keyword-based filtering applied exclusively to LGBTIQ terms within Russia and that it is not active in Canada or Ukraine. Moreover, it is unclear why this filtering is only applied to searches for communities and personal accounts, but not for videos. To underscore how these terms were not being censored as part of an “adult only” or safe-search filter but only being used for LGBTIQ filtering, we additionally tested the following search queries:

• pornography
• порнография
• порно
• секс
• ебать
• блять
• трахаться
• трахать
• анальный
• сука
• пизда

As none of the terms above triggered keyword-based censorship of our search queries, we can conclude that the LGBTIQ-based keyword censorship is not part of a larger safe-search feature but rather one meant to target solely LGBTIQ-related search queries.

It is unclear why keyword-based filtering is only used to censor LGBTIQ search queries and not queries for content critical of Putin, the invasion of Ukraine, or other content found blocked elsewhere on VK. Keyword-based blocking is a particularly blunt tool. On one hand, it is overly broad, capturing content that may not have been intended. For example, we found that many anti-LGBTIQ groups existed on VK, and thus the blocking of LGBTIQ-related searches prevented users from discovering pro- and anti-LGBTIQ groups alike. On the other hand, keyword-based blocking is simultaneously narrow. As one example, we found that “LGBT” and “LGBTQ” were blocked but not other variants such as “LGBTQIA”. As another, although “gay” was censored, “gays” was not. Some terms were blocked in both Cyrillic and Roman characters (e.g., “Геи” and “gay”) while others only in Cyrillic but not in Roman (e.g., “Фембой” but not “femboy”). These inconsistencies give the impression that the list of blocked terms used by VK was arbitrarily created. Finally, as keyword-based filtering only applies to searches, users can still access communities and personal accounts whose names contain blocked keywords by searching for other keywords in their names or by typing the URLs to their pages directly.

Given that keyword-based blocking is simultaneously both too broad and too narrow, as well as ineffective, it is unclear why it is applied only to LGBTIQ content, much less any content at all. One possibility is that, because the anti-LGBT “propaganda” laws (including the federal law “for the Purpose of Protecting Children from Information Advocating a Denial of Traditional Family Values”) are vague concerning what constitutes “LGBT propaganda,” this type of filtering is intended to be very visible to users, although it is not actually effective at censoring content. In this sense, this filtering may be acting as a sort of “compliance checkbox” to attempt to demonstrate compliance with Russian law.

Consistent legal justification

We found that VK attributed every blocked community or person in Russia to a court decision and that every blocked video in Russia was attributable to a blocked community or person. Altogether, there were 336 different VK block messages that cited 303 unique legal case numbers. In some instances, we were able to find the text of the court decision ordering the blocking of the communities or personal accounts and retrieve the law cited to justify the ordering of the blocking. More study is needed to systematically analyze the court cases and laws justifying VK’s blocking decisions and to determine both whether VK cites appropriate court decisions to justify its blocking and whether those court decisions cite appropriate laws to justify their blocking orders. It seems that, in many cases, the necessary information may be available to perform such an analysis. At this time, we will merely call attention to one block message which is notable because a press release was also cited:

“Этот материал заблокирован на территории РФ на основании решения суда/уполномоченного федерального органа исполнительной власти (Металлургический районный суд г. Челябинска – Челябинская область) от 11.12.2019 № 2а-3052/2019 Комментарий ВКонтакте: vk.com/press/blocking-public38905640 ”

In English:

[This material was blocked on the territory of the Russian Federation on the basis of the decision of the court / authorized federal executive body (Metallurgichesky District Court of Chelyabinsk – Chelyabinsk Region) dated December 11, 2019 No. 2a-3052/2019 Comment VKontakte: vk.com/press/blocking-public38905640 ]

In the linked March 2021 press release , VK notes Russia’s increasingly tightening regulations of social media networks and legal obligations to implement proactive censorship measures in justifying the blocking of the “Альянс гетеросексуалов и ЛГБТ за равноправие” [Alliance of Heterosexuals and LGBT for Equality] VK community.

Gaps in blocking transparency

While VK consistently attributed blocking in Russia to court orders, VK’s approach of blocking users, and then transitively all of their videos, rather than blocking specific videos themselves, still lacks transparency on multiple levels. Although VK consistently provides a legal justification for why a community or personal account is blocked in Russia, when viewing a blocked video it is not clear who the poster was, and, even if the blocked poster is known, it is not clear to other VK users which video or other content from that user may be responsible for their blocking. This problem is exacerbated as VK’s blocking has the effect of capturing all past and future posted videos of the blocked community or personal account. Thus, VK’s approach has a tendency to over-block, as a community or personal account may have multiple interests and post content on a variety of topics, including benign ones that are unrelated to the original justification of a block. Reviewing some of the court orders which VK cited in justifying account blocking, we found that the orders had no associated time period. Thus, the blocks may be applied in perpetuity, exacerbating this over-blocking. Further, it is not clear if VK notifies a poster that their content is being blocked in Russia. Thus, VK users may be unaware that all of their content is unavailable to users in Russia, especially if they are using VK from a region other than Russia.

Inconsistent copyright enforcement

We found that copyrighted entertainment content was often blocked in Canada including TV, sports, and music, while current events was the type of content that was blocked the most in Russia, mainly those dealing with the Ukraine war and Belarus. Copyrighted content was thus largely accessible in Russia even when it was blocked in Canada. Although in this report we did not systematically compare Ukraine and Canada for differential blocking, we generally observed that the same copyrighted content unavailable in Canada was accessible in Ukraine. This observation suggests that VK approaches moderation around copyright on a geographical basis, rather than using a method which distinguishes Russia from all other countries. Based on our analysis, VK’s approach to copyright moderation is far more lax and permissive in Russia and Ukraine than in Canada. That is, VK users in Canada have more content restricted based on a copyright justification, compared to users in Russia and Ukraine. We also found, despite this uneven application of copyright enforcement, that pirated content is widespread on the platform. This finding is especially true for ebooks and music content, which are widely available on VK.

This differential treatment of users by region is also revealed in other manners, such as in VK’s privacy policy, which has different data retention policies for Russian users versus users outside of Russia. For example, according to those policies, VK “store[s] Russian users’ messages for six months and other data for a year (in accordance with paragraph 3, Article 10.1 of Federal Law ‘On Information, Information Technologies, and Information Protection).”

Comparison to Chinese social media censorship

China’s social media information control system is decentralized and characterized by “ intermediary liability ,” or what China refers to as “ self-discipline ,” allowing the Chinese government to push responsibility for information control to the private sector. Internet operators which are deemed to have failed to have adequately implemented information controls are liable to receive fines, have their business licenses revoked, or be the recipient of other adverse actions. These companies are largely left to decide on their own regarding what to proactively censor on their platforms, attempting to balance the expectations of their users with appeasing the Chinese government. In China, block messages are often not displayed by Chinese platforms and therefore users have no way of knowing the legal justification for the blocked content. However, in Russia, VK ultimately attributed the blocking of each video, community, or person to whichever court case ordered the blocking of that content. In some cases, we were able to find the text of the court case and retrieve the laws cited in justifying the takedown request. While much may be lacking in terms of due process in Russia’s court-ordered blocking approach, this system is still more transparent than in China, where blocking decisions are more proactively done by the private sector, with blocking decisions being left largely to the discretion of Internet operators.

Chinese social media companies have struggled to grow their platforms globally and to apply information controls while they expand. Tencent’s WeChat has been scrutinized for its application of Chinese political censorship and surveillance, either expressly or secretly , to conversations among users entirely registered outside of China. Furthermore, when using WeChat, users have no visibility into whether they are communicating with a user registered in China and therefore cannot predict the extent to which their communications will be subject to political censorship or surveillance. Unlike Tencent, Bytedance simply abandoned the idea of growing a single platform with radically different information control rules for users inside versus outside of China. Instead, Bytedance operates Douyin inside China and a platform with a completely distinct user base, TikTok, outside of China. VK’s approach of blocking community and user accounts, but not content directly, may have some advantage in alleviating the friction in attempting to expand VK globally, or outside of the Russian information control regime. On VK, users in Russia are simply unable to communicate or read the content of users blocked in Russia, and thus there have not been negative media stories covering how non-Russia-based users are having their content deleted in the style of those covering WeChat. This difference is because, on VK, politically motivated blocking is seemingly applied only to users and not individual content.

At a high level, there are both similarities and differences in the topics censored in Russia and China. In both countries, foreign news sources and criticism of its top leaders are subject to censorship. However, each country also has their particular sensitivities. For instance, while Chinese social media has not always been friendly to LGBTIQ content, in Russia, such content is aggressively targeted , as facilitated by the anti-LGBTIQ “propaganda” laws. In light of its invasion of Ukraine, Russia is also particularly sensitive to content that is critical of the Russian side of the armed conflict. Conversely, some of China’s evergreen political sensitivities include the Falun Gong spiritual/political movement, the status of Taiwan , and calls for independence of Tibet, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong. While Chinese social media has also been quick to censor content related to the COVID-19 pandemic , we did not find differential censorship relating to COVID-19 on VK, but this might be because such content was removed in all regions that we analyzed.

While both China and Russia use Internet censorship to protect the political images of their own leaders, they are inconsistent in how they protect the images of each others’ leaders. Although Chinese Internet platforms appear willing to help protect the image of Putin, we found no evidence of VK blocking content critical of Xi Jinping or any other Chinese leader. In our ongoing study of censorship on Chinese search platforms , we have found that Chinese search engines Baidu and Sogou and video sharing site Bilibili enforce censorship rules relating to “普京” [Putin]. As examples, we found that search queries on Sogou containing “普京 + 独裁” [Putin + dictatorship], “普京 + 希特勒” [Putin + Hitler], or “普京窃国” [Putin’s kleptocracy] restricted search results to only Chinese state media websites and other Beijing-aligned sources. While some censorship rules seem solely focused on protecting Putin’s image, others may reveal China’s less-than-altruistic motivations in doing so. For instance, “普京亲信兵变 + 震动中南海” [mutiny of Putin’s cronies + shaking in the Chinese Communist Party’s headquarters] and “台湾 + 成为下一个乌克兰” [Taiwan + becoming the next Ukraine] reveal China’s insecurities concerning how Prigozhin’s mutiny may be predictive of the future stability of Chinese Communist Party’s own regime and how Russia’s unanticipated difficulties invading Ukraine may be prognostic of any future realization of China’s own ambitions to invade Taiwan. More generally, Chinese censors may be motivated to protect Putin’s image not only because Russia is an ally of China but also because of the similarities in and therefore common insecurities born from their methods of governance. Regardless of Chinese censors’ motivations here, we found no evidence that Russia’s VK reciprocated the favor by helping to protect China’s leaders from criticism on VK.

Finally, while there are theories that the Internet is “ balkanizing ” or becoming a “ splinternet ” wherein different countries or regions slowly form their own isolated networks over time, examples of social media censorship from both China and Russia show that the borders of these isolated networks may be fairly permissive but only in one direction. On WeChat, users with China-registered accounts are subject to the platform’s invasive political censorship, whereas users in other countries can not only access WeChat but also express political ideas with one another with relative amounts of freedom compared to their Chinese counterparts. We find the same with VK in that VK subjects users in Russia to pervasive levels of political censorship, whereas users in other countries are not only allowed membership on the site but are also relatively more free to engage in political speech. In an irony, each of these social media networks subjugates users from the country in which the network was founded with the greatest restrictions, whereas, not only do these networks allow users to join from other countries but also grant these users the freedom to engage in a larger range of political expression.

The complete set of videos, communities, and people that we found blocked in Russia and Canada, as well as their block messages, are available on GitHub at the following link: https://github.com/citizenlab/not-ok-on-vk-data

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Michelle Akim, Siena Anstis, Pellaeon Lin, Irene Poetranto, Adam Senft, and Andrei Soldatov for valuable editing and peer review. Research for this project was supervised by Ron Deibert.

Appendix A: Accessibility of VK in Ukraine

In 2017, a presidential decree issued by the Petro Poroshenko administration ordered VK and other Russian social media platforms to be blocked on Ukrainian network providers. This order was extended in 2020 by the Zelensky administration until 2023 . In order to accurately contextualize the findings in this report with the real world effect on Ukrainian users, we reviewed recent data to measure the accessibility of VK in Ukraine. Namely, we reviewed relevant data collected by the Open Observatory of Network Interference (OONI) , which is a non-profit organization that collects global data of website accessibility. Measurements of website accessibility are performed by volunteers who run software (called OONI Probe ) which attempts to access a list of websites , including VK, reporting the results to a centralized database. We reviewed this database of measurements, specifically all attempts to access any site under the “vk.com” domain space in Ukraine from May 20, 2023 to June 20, 2023. This review covered a total of 295 measurements coming from 20 networks in Ukraine. We find that VK remains consistently blocked in Ukraine during this period on all but three networks. We also find that in six networks circumventing the blocks is likely easy to accomplish based on how the blocking is carried out.

Table 20: Summary of VK availability in Ukraine during May 20 to June 20, 2023, according to OONI measurements.

We find that VK is blocked in Ukraine using a variety of methods depending on the network. This variation indicates that censorship of VK is likely implemented at the ISP level rather than by a government-run national filtering system. Furthermore, we see three networks — UKRAINE-AS (AS200000), UMC-AS (AS21497) and the Satellite network provider SpaceX (AS14593) — where VK remains available. However, on the network UKRAINE-AS, although VK was accessible in seven measurements, the connection timed out in one measurement. On all other remaining 17 networks, VK was blocked, though the method by which this was implemented varied. The networks mainly either blocked VK by IP (9 out of 20 networks) or returned incorrect IP responses from their DNS servers (5 out of 20 networks). One network, INTERTELECOM-AS (AS25386), both blocked VK by IP, as well as by providing an incorrect DNS server response that returned a block page. One network (KOMITEX-AS AS30886) injected incorrect DNS responses and another, ISP-STATUS (AS25482), blocked VK at the HTTP level.

It is important to note that blocking which is implemented solely by returning an incorrect DNS server response, as is the case on five networks, should be easy for knowledgeable users to circumvent. Simply changing the DNS server from the ISP hosted default to a public DNS server provided by Quad9 or CloudFlare may be sufficient to circumvent this blocking. Furthermore, some systems may be already preconfigured to use a DNS server not provided by a user’s ISP. Firefox, for instance, uses DNS over HTTPS (DoH) by default in multiple countries including Ukraine , automatically circumventing DNS-based blocking. Networks implementing such easily, and perhaps even accidentally, evadable blocking may explain why Ukraine still has the third largest number of visitors to VK despite its drop in visitation.

Only four networks communicated the block transparently to users all of the time by displaying a block page: Triolan (AS13188), Kyivstar (AS15895), ASIPN, which is known more widely as IPnet.ua , (AS25521), and UMC (AS21497). All four networks are large residential ISPs in the country. For example, this sample measurement on the Triolan network shows that an attempt to access “ https://vk.com ” leads to an SSL error or a block page. This page reads in part: “WARNING! Access to the resource cannot be granted! Access to this resource is not granted in order to fulfill the Decrees of the President of Ukraine”, and it cites the relevant legal decrees which are listed on the page as:

• No. 133/2017 dated May 15, 2017 ( Appendix No. 1 , Appendix No. 2 )
• No. 126/2018 dated May 14, 2018 ( Appendix No. 1 , Appendix No. 2 )
• No. 82/2019 dated March 19, 2019 ( Appendix No. 1 , Appendix No. 2 , Appendix No. 3 , Appendix No. 4 )

One network, Intertelecom (AS25386), communicated the block transparently only some (42.5%) of the time. The remaining 12 networks did not transparently return a block message to the user. For users on these networks, attempts to access VK resulted in these requests failing, which is similar to other network errors, and without providing a legal justification. Therefore, we found the blocking of VK in Ukraine to be highly variable. Some networks perform no blocking, and among those that do, users on those networks may not experience blocking depending on their DNS configuration. Finally, for those in Ukraine whose access to VK is blocked, they may receive a block message or a network or SSL error.

Media Mentions

New York Times , Teplitsa

Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise noted this site and its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Canada license.

To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories .

• The Big Story
• Newsletters
• Steven Levy's Plaintext Column
• WIRED Classics from the Archive
• WIRED Insider
• WIRED Consulting

Porn Sites Still Won’t Take Down Nonconsensual Deepfakes

Application

Content moderation

Identifying Fabrications

Source Data

Hundreds of explicit deepfake videos featuring female celebrities, actresses, and musicians are being uploaded to the world’s biggest pornography websites every month, new analysis shows. The nonconsensual videos rack up millions of views , and porn companies are still failing to remove them from their websites.

Up to 1,000 deepfake videos have been uploaded to porn sites every month as they became increasingly popular during 2020, figures from deepfake detection company Sensity show. The videos continue to break away from dedicated deepfake pornography communities and into the mainstream.

Deepfake videos hosted on three of the biggest porn websites, XVideos, Xnxx, and xHamster, have been viewed millions of times. The videos are surrounded by ads, helping to make money for the sites. XVideos and Xnxx, which are both owned by the same Czech holding company, are the number one and three biggest porn websites in the world and rank in the top 10 biggest sites across the entire web. They each have, or exceed, as many visitors as Wikipedia, Amazon, and Reddit.

One 30-second video, which appears on all three of the above sites and uses actress Emma Watson’s face, has been viewed more than 23 million times—being watched 13 million times on Xnxx. Other deepfake videos, which have hundreds of thousands or millions of views, include celebrities such as Natalie Portman, Billie Eilish, Taylor Swift, and Indian actress Anushka Shetty. Many of the celebrities have continuously been the targets of deepfakes since they first emerged in 2018.

“The attitude of these websites is that they don't really consider this a problem,” says Giorgio Patrini, CEO and chief scientist at Sensity, which was until recently called DeepTrace. Deepfake pornography videos are widely considered to target, harm, and humiliate the women that are placed at their center. Patrini adds that Sensity has increasingly seen deepfakes being made for other people in the public realm, such as Instagram, Twitch and YouTube influencers, and he worries the advancement of deepfake tech will inevitably see members of the public targeted.

“Until there is a strong reason for [porn websites] to try to take them down and to filter them, I strongly believe nothing is going to happen,” Patrini says. “People will still be free to upload this type of material without any consequences to these websites that are viewed by hundreds of millions of people”.

Many of the videos are hiding in plain sight—they’re uploaded to be watched, after all. Some videos include “fake” or “deepfake” in their titles and are tagged as being a deepfake. For instance, tag pages on XVideos and Xnxx list hundreds of the videos.

However, the full scale of the problem on porn websites is unknown. There will probably never be a true picture of how many of these videos are created without people’s permission.

Despite repeated attempts to contact representatives of XVideos and Xnxx, the owners did not answer requests for comment on their attitudes and policies towards deepfakes.

Alex Hawkins, VP of xHamster, says the company doesn’t have a specific policy for deepfakes but treats them “like any other nonconsensual content.” Hawkins says that the company’s moderation process involves multiple different steps, and it will remove videos if people’s images are used without permission.

“We absolutely understand the concern around deepfakes, so we make it easy for it to be removed,” Hawkins says. “Content uploaded without necessary permission being obtained is in violation of our Terms of Use and will be removed once identified.” Hawkins adds that the dozens of videos appearing as deepfakes on xHamster, which were highlighted by WIRED, have been passed onto its moderation team to be reviewed.

Deepfake upload figures seen by WIRED did not include Pornhub, which is the second-biggest porn website and despite banning deepfakes in 2018 still has problems with the videos .

“There has to be some kind of thinking about what we do about this when women are embarrassed and humiliated and demeaned in this way on the internet, and it really is like a question about privacy and security,” says Nina Schick, a political broadcaster and the author of Deepfakes and the Infocalypse .

Since the first deepfakes emerged from Reddit in early 2018, the underlying artificial intelligence technology needed to make them has advanced. It’s getting cheaper and easier for people to make deepfake videos. In one recent example , a security researcher using open-source software and spending less than $100 was able to create video and audio of Tom Hanks.

The tech advancements have raised fears that deepfakes will be used to manipulate political conversations. While there were some early examples of this happening, the threat has largely failed to materialize. However, deepfake porn, where the technology was first invented, has flourished. Hollywood actress Kristen Bell said she was “shocked” when she first found out deepfakes were made using her image. “‘Even if it’s labelled as, ‘Oh, this is not actually her,’ it’s hard to think about that. I’m being exploited,” she told Vox in June.

The amount of deepfakes online is growing exponentially. A report from Sensity released last year found 14,678 deepfake videos online in July 2019—96 percent of these were porn and almost all are focused on women. By June this year the amount of deepfakes had climbed to 49,081.

The majority of deepfake porn is found on, and created by, specific communities. The top four deepfake porn websites received more than 134 million views last year, Sensity’s 2019 analysis shows. One deepfake porn website is full of videos featuring celebrities and contains videos of Indian actresses that have been watched millions of times. Some videos state they were requested, while their creators say they can be paid in bitcoin.

“Some of this technology is improving so fast, because there's so much energy and drive, unfortunately, from the creators’ side,” Patrini says. “I think we're going to be seeing it applied very soon with much larger intent to private individuals.” He believes when the technology is easy for anyone to use there will be a “tipping point” when lawmakers will become aware of the problems.

Clare McGlynn, a professor at the Durham Law School who specializes in pornography regulations and sexual abuse images, agrees. “What this shows is the looming problem that is going to come for non-celebrities,” she says. “This is a serious issue for celebrities and others in the public eye. But my long­standing concern, speaking to survivors who are not celebrities, is the risk of what is coming down the line.”

At the moment, the legal options for people featured in deepfake videos has not kept up with the technology. In fact, it wasn’t ever prepared for the impact of AI-generated porn. “If a pornographic picture or video of you goes up online, your legal options for taking it down vary wildly,” says Aislinn O'Connell, a law lecturer from Royal Holloway University in London.

People can pursue nonconsensual uploads for defamation, under human rights laws, copyright complaints, and other forms. However, most of these processes are onerous, resource-intensive and most often don’t apply to deepfakes. “We need more and better solutions now,” O'Connell says.

Some deepfake laws have been passed in US states, but these largely focus on politics and ignore the impact that deepfakes are already having on people’s lives. In the UK the Law Commission is conducting a review into the sharing of intimate images online, which includes deepfakes, but it is expected to take years until any changes can be made. O'Connell proposes that England adopts image rights laws so people can properly protect themselves.

However, while lawmakers fail to deal with the problem, the technology is set to become cheaper and easier for all to use. “I see the evolution of deepfakes in the pornographic space as actually the harbinger of the bigger civil liberties issues that are going to emerge,” Schick says.

“This technology is out there, and it is evolving at a rate that is much faster than society can keep up with,” she adds. “We are not ready for the age of synthetic media, where even video becomes something that almost anybody can corrupt.” To fight this, Schick says, multiple people need to be involved—technologists, the public, domain-specific experts, policy officials, and lawmakers. Right now, however, that’s not happening.

This story originally appeared on WIRED UK .

• 📩 Want the latest on tech, science, and more? Sign up for our newsletters !
• My week of radical transparency at a Chinese business seminar
• Inside the sprint to map the murder hornet genome
• 9 apps to boost your phone's security and privacy
• How courthouse break-ins landed two white hat hackers in jail
• Tips to stay cool without air conditioning
• 🎧 Things not sounding right? Check out our favorite wireless headphones , soundbars , and Bluetooth speakers